UK Lawyer to Face Tribunal Over Alleged Touching, KKK Comment
The lawyer is alleged to have put an A4 envelope on his head and made a reference to the Ku Klux Klan.
July 28, 2020 at 04:55 AM
3 minute read
A lawyer has been referred to the U.K.'s Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) after being accused of inappropriate touching and of making a Ku Klux Klan comment.
Samuel Charkham was investigated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority after several allegations were made about his behaviour while he was a lawyer at media specialist firm Simkins.
In a prosecution filing published 16 July, the SRA said that Charkham was accused of having told "a joke containing a racially abusive term" on or about December 2016 while at a social event organised by the firm; having touched Person A's "bottom on more than one occasion" between 2014 and 2017; and having "touched Person B's backside" on 22 February 2018.
He was also accused of having acted towards Person A "in a manner which was inappropriate and/or unwanted in that he moved towards Person A wearing a white A4 envelope on his head and used words to the effect of "I've joined the Ku Klux Klan"' on or about 13 January 2017, while in the firm's office.
Charkham is currently at fellow media boutique Portner Law, according to the SRA filing. According to Portner Law's website, he is a consultant in its property department.
The matter was referred by the SRA to the SDT in November 2019, according to the filing.
In a statement, Simkins said Charkham left the firm more than two years ago and that it would be inappropriate for the firm to comment given the ongoing nature of proceedings. But it then added: "Simkins is committed to promoting a working environment in which all individuals are treated with dignity and respect and in which all can thrive regardless of their background or personal circumstances. We take any allegation of discrimination or inappropriate behaviour seriously and will promptly investigate any such allegation and then take the appropriate action."
Portner did not respond to requests for comment.
The allegations are subject to a hearing before the SDT and are as yet unproven.
Read More:
Lloyds HBOS Fraud Scandal: The Accusations Against HSF Explained
Former U.S. Firm Staffer Banned for Using Firm Credit Card for Personal Withdrawals
Former DAC Beachcroft and Slater & Gordon Paralegals Banned From Profession
'He'll Have to Pay His Own Fees': Lawyers React to 'Surprising' Gary Senior Outcome
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Stewarts and DAC Beachcroft Lead on £2B Leicester City Helicopter Crash Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Monday Newspaper
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-98
- 4'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 511th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250