Editors Note: This story is part of a series on how the highly competitive talent market in the legal industry is reshaping hiring norms in the legal profession.
'Remote Forever': Lawyers Look to Move Firms so They Don't Have to Leave Their House
Changing jobs now can mean a courier comes and picks up your old laptop and another arrives to deliver your new one.
June 01, 2021 at 02:30 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The hesitancy that came from lockdowns and mandated work-from-home orders at the height of the pandemic seems to have entirely dissipated for some partners and associates alike who have embraced the experience and want to make it a permanent way of life.
Earlier this month, some associates professed a hesitancy to return to any form of so-called normal office attendance. Mid-career and senior associates, in particular, felt that they were in their element on Zoom calls with colleagues and clients—able to contribute more effectively to their practices and enjoying greater visibility both in the firm, and with clients.
"I don't want to go back to the office and the way things were before," said one sixth-year associate at an Am Law 200 firm who chose to remain anonymous to speak candidly at the time. "I just don't think I'll have the same opportunity to contribute the way I have in the virtual environment."
"You're going to have to go back," decried another associate. "Unless permanent remote positions start being offered, and it becomes more common in the legal industry. And if that happens, I think the firms who offer those positions will have a huge recruitment advantage."
Speaking with recruiters, it seems that it isn't just some associates who feel that way. Senior attorneys too—partners who can take their book of business with them—aren't happy about the idea of returning to office life. And while this sentiment may prove problematic for firms wishing a return to pre-pandemic normalcy, other firms are positioning themselves to take advantage of a seemingly growing band of homebound rebels.
Dan Scott is a national recruiter based in Rochester, Michigan, who places partners and associates in law firms, working with "highly successful individuals looking for a change of environment."
Lately, he says lately he's had "numerous" lawyers asking him to find them remote roles. And these lawyers are contemplating leaving their current firms because they won't be able to work remotely in the future, he says.
"In this climate, changing jobs now can mean a courier comes and picks up your old laptop and another arrives to deliver your new one," says Scott.
John Eads, former Wilson Elser regional managing partner in Detroit who recently moved to Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, would agree that the ability to work remotely is now a big draw for some attorneys.
Last week, 12 Wilson Elser attorneys in Detriot followed him across to his new firm. He says part of the reason for their move is that younger attorneys and staff will have "more opportunities for upward mobility" at Gordon Rees, because the firm "supports attorneys working remotely by issuing laptops to all personnel."
Scott says some firms are now specifically offering remote positions to take advantage of what they think will be a flood of talent with preferences to work from home.
"I'm working two positions right now, data breach response, one partner and one associate, both for the same firm," Scott says. "The fact that the firm will allow 'remote forever' is critical to my ability to find them people."
Scott says around 40% of the firms he is currently recruiting for "don't care" if new recruits want to permanently work remotely—especially firms outside the big East Coast and West Coast markets: "They'll make a place for big-market associates looking to move to a smaller market. These firms are simply looking for talent."
Lori Carpenter, president of Pittsburgh-based Carpenter Legal Search, says many partners are drawn to firms offering remote working arrangements, pointing to the growth of FisherBroyles, which broke into the Am Law 200 ranking with a 2020 gross revenue of $113 million and added 51 partners last year.
However, many firms are concerned that virtual working environments could create barriers when it comes to maintaining a strong firm culture and mentoring younger lawyers, Carpenter said.
"If you're going to have associates come into the office, you're going to need partners in the office, so you're going to need consistency there," Carpenter says. "The question becomes how does the partnership say to its partners, 'you've got to be in the office with these associates.'"
Recruitment firm Major, Lindsay & Africa's Deborah Ben-Canaan, who recruits for in-house positions in the D.C. area, says she has seen an increase in law firm attorneys seeking in-house roles that are open to remote working.
"We are starting to see more demand for remote positions with the occasional trip to the office," says Ben-Canaan. "Especially among younger associates who have a different view of digital and remote working. They are much more comfortable with these environments."
Ben-Canaan says on the client side she is also starting to see more openness to the idea, however not in industries like defense and aerospace where employees need to be in the office to handle confidential material.
Robert Taylor is CEO and general counsel of U.K.-based 360 Law Group, a global law firm that operates via a low overhead corporate structure by hiring attorneys remotely around the world on a consultant basis. In February last year, Taylor opened a dedicated U.S. business called 360 Business Law America and says he now has a presence in 34 states. Taylor says as lawyers are being told they must return to the office, he has received a flood of inquiries from associates and partners alike at Magic Circle firms in London and white-shoe firms in the United States, looking to find jobs that don't require them to return to the office.
"The whole market is changing. The big firms are not in control anymore," Taylor says. "Clients are driving changes in legal services, and they do not care if their lawyers are in an office or working from their spare room. Lawyers realize they don't have to be at a big firm to do good work."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells Johannesburg MP Joins ALN; Firm Relocates Partner to D.C. After Closure
3 minute readArizona Board Approves KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Simmons Partner Joins French IP Boutique to Lead New Amsterdam Outpost
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
- 2Cybersecurity Breaches, Cyberbullying, and Ways to Help Protect Clients From Both
- 3AI in 2025: Five Key Predictions on How It Will Reshape International Law Firms
- 4Justice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
- 5Robinson & Cole Elects New Partners and Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250