Allen & Overy is offering its Luxembourg people a generous parental leave package as law firms spend more time considering how to make their workplaces a positive space for those with familial responsibilities.
The firm has decided to offer Luxembourg lawyers and support staff who take parental leave additional financial compensation on top of the country's statutory government allowance.
Under the new policy, those who have spent at least three years at firm and make €6,000 a month or lower will be able to retain at least 85% percent of their monthly salary while staying at home with their children.
Those who make more than €6,000 per month will be paid out at least 75% of their monthly salary, with both levels of compensation offered for a maximum period of four months in case of full-time leave, and a maximum period of eight months for lawyers taking a part-time career break. "Assuming that cost will I hope demonstrate that we take this seriously and that [we] want to actively promote parental leave," said Patrick Mischo, Allen & Overy Luxembourg office senior partner.
"We feel it's important for parents to be able to take parental leave, whether they are men or women," he added. The new policy, which came into effect earlier this year, aims to redress a persistent gender imbalance in who takes career breaks for childcare, Mischo said.
He added that historically in the legal sector and other companies, women have been more likely to take career breaks to look after children, which can impact on their progression in a gender imbalanced way. But if every lawyer with small children at the firm takes time off, that imbalance disappears, he said. "Then there's a full level playing field. Because in terms of professional experience, everyone is in exactly the same boat."
When the issue was discussed internally, Mischo said that the financial impact was a major reason keeping many lawyers with young children from taking time off.
"That's the reason we decided to top up what you get from the government," he added. "So that it's financially more attractive." Under Luxembourg law, working parents with children younger than six can take up to six months off work and receive a replacement income from the government during this time. The allowance depends on number of hours worked per week and income earned, but for those working full-time it ranges from €2,200 to €3,700 for full-time leaves.
Given that senior associates at major firms in the Grand Duchy can expect to take home monthly salaries ranging between €7,500 to €12,000, that means a steep drop in income for most lawyers.
The firm also hopes the move will help them attract and retain talent. In Luxembourg, as in many jurisdictions around the world, work is booming and talent scarce.
"Feeling allowed to take time off to be with your newborns without your career suffering from it, obviously, that can be something very attractive in terms of recruiting and retaining talent," Mischo added.
A&O's offering is generous compared to some other firms in the region. Several Luxembourg law firms told Law.com International that they do not offer anything more than the country's statutory requirements.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Expect From Teresa Ribera, the EU‘s New Competition Commissioner
5 minute readRopes & Gray Registers Paris Services Company Amid Talk of France Office Launch
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 2Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 3Spoliation Sanctions
- 4At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
- 5Arguing Class Actions: CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250