Major Law Firms Begin Overhauling Saudi Strategy Following Rule Change
Norton Rose Fulbright, White & Case and Jones Day are among the firms already reviewing their options.
October 11, 2022 at 12:01 AM
5 minute read
Law Firm ManagementSeveral major law firms have started reviewing or overhauling their strategies in Saudi Arabia ahead of a crucial change in the Kingdom's law that will prohibit the way most of them currently operate there.
A change in the law ending 'association' arrangements, which have been a pre-condition of entry to the Saudi market for over a decade, is expected to come into effect in May 2023. Joint ventures and branch offices are the only forms of engagement that will be now sanctioned.
Firms are busy taking stock of their options. Norton Rose Fulbright is already in the process of ending its Saudi Arabia association with Riyadh-based The Mohammed Al-Ghamdi Law Firm, according to multiple people in the Kingdom with knowledge of the situation.
Without confirming the termination of its current association, a spokesperson for Norton Rose said that, due to the new regulatory and licensing regime in Saudi Arabia, whereby all current associations will end by May 31, 2023, "we are considering several options in the region as we assess our client needs in the Middle East".
A person close to the firm said that "discussions are taking place".
White & Case, which has an association with Riyadh law firm The Law Office of Megren M. Al-Shaalan, has confirmed that it is currently assessing its options and that "the goal is to ensure that we continue to have a presence in Saudi Arabia".
Sheila Shadmand, Middle East leader at Jones Day which has an association with Riyadh-based partner Ebrahim Al-Habardi, said: "We are aware of the change in regulations and are discussing our options. We have not terminated our association."
Other firms are expected to do the same. Other major law firms with long-established cooperation agreements in Saudi Arabia include Latham & Watkins (with The Law Firm of Salman M. Al-Sudairi), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (with The Law Firm of Salah Al-Hejailan) and Clifford Chance (with The Abuhimed Alsheikh Alhagbani Law Firm).
Allen & Overy decided to end its exclusive cooperation agreement with Saudi firm Khoshaim & Associates in 2020, opting instead to work with multiple law firms in the region.
The rule change will mean that foreign firms will either have to set up a joint venture with registered KSA lawyers as co-shareholders, with KSA partners holding at least 25% of the business, or create a branch office, which can be held 100% by the parent entity—but in this case, Saudi law advice may not be given.
One lawyer said that the new rules for legal practice were meant to take effect on September 4, but this deadline was extended by nine months.
While the rule change was designed to afford greater flexibility to international law firms and enable them to set up shop on more or less their own terms, in the immediate future some believe it will cause teething problems.
One lawyer based in the region said that, following the rule change, they expect "market attrition", "with the likely prospect of further defections".
Another lawyer added: "The new rules are in my view so unworkable from the global industry's perspective that they should more appropriately be scrapped altogether, and radically rethought. Given the obstacles and business- unfriendly attitude of the Ministry of Justice and Saudi Bar, I'll be surprised to see any new entrants."
There are also concerns that local lawyers might be edged out of the market by a major international law firm influx, something the Saudi authorities seem to be mindful of. Some believe the Saudi Justice Ministry's mandate is protectionist, meaning it will look to ensure such an invasion does not lead to the diminution of opportunity for Saudi lawyers.
However, lawyers in Clyde & Co's Saudi team believe the law change is workable, saying in a statement: "For international firms to establish a presence here will require a real commitment and investment in the Kingdom, but for those international firms (like ours) who are prepared to do that, there are real opportunities as there is a lot of legal work to be done. As to how long these changes will take to implement, it is difficult to say. The timeline may differ for different firms."
One lawyer said Saudiisation quotas at lawyer level had risen from 50% to 70%, in the face of new rules that would restrict branches of foreign firms from providing local advice. He then went on to ask: "What would majority Saudi workforces be expected to do, if not advise on local law?
"The best way to increase opportunities for local lawyers is to open the doors to major firms from whom they can learn the tools of the profession," the lawyer said.
The lawyer added the salient question facing the Saudi legal profession was whether to shield an ailing domestic bench or create opportunities for real employment from firms capable of attracting serious clients.
In the past decade and more, several firms have opened associate offices in the Kingdom.
In 2010, Trowers & Hamlins became one of the earliest examples to set up a partnership, in Jeddah. In 2014, Clyde & Co became the second international outfit to launch a Saudi and foreign-owned company.
Several associations have followed, including those of Linklaters in 2017, HFW in 2019, and Gowling WLG and Curtis Mallet in 2021. Earlier this year, Addleshaw Goddard was believed to be considering a Saudi launch.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ to Crack the U.S.
6 minute read'If You Have the Offering, India Is the Shining Star': International Firms on Building Up Their India Desks
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 2A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
- 3From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250