China's JunHe Expands in US with Office in Seattle
JunHe now has three international offices, all based in the U.S.
January 07, 2024 at 10:18 PM
3 minute read
Beijing-based JunHe, one of China's elite domestic practices, has expanded its U.S. offering with an office launch in Seattle.
Its new outfit will be led by corporate partner Adam Li, who has been based in JunHe's Silicon Valley office for over a decade. Li advises on mergers and acquisitions, private equity and outbound investments. He is qualified in mainland China, Washington D.C. and New York.
The office is the firm's third in the U.S., alongside Silicon Valley and New York.
According to Warren Hua, JunHe's managing partner, the Seattle office will focus on entrepreneurship-related business and legal needs. In a statement, the firm also cited global brands such as Boeing, Starbucks, Costco, Microsoft and Amazon being based and founded in Seattle, demonstrating the growth potential and demographic of companies that JunHe is targeting in the region.
"It is not only Seattle," Hua told Law.com International. "It is about the West Coast and beyond. West Coast is about entrepreneurship and new technology."
"We would focus on Asian clients, who have either tech or investment background but relatively new to the U.S. to explore, invest and grow," Hua explained, adding that JunHe will also continue to provide Chinese law advice.
According to Hua, the growth and size of JunHe's Seattle office would depend on its performance in the West Coast, which can be "determined by a lot of factors".
JunHe is one of China's longest standing law firms, widely recognized as one of the country's elite practices. The firm ranks 168th position on the Global 200 ranking by gross revenue, having brought in over $315 million in gross revenue in 2022. It has a headcount of over 700 lawyers across 13 global offices in mainland China and the U.S.
According to the firm's statement, its launch in Seattle marks an extension of the firm's internationalization strategy.
To some law firm leaders, the ongoing geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China present opportunities. Last year, Beijing-based Han Kun Law Offices also launched its second overseas office in New York. Another Chinese firm Hylands Law Firm also planted a flag in San Francisco earlier last year.
"There are many issues and doubts on U.S.-China trade," said Hua. "That is exactly why lawyers are playing a more important roles to bridge the gap and ensure compliance."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJapanese Firm Miura & Partners Opens Another Office in Southeast Asia
A&O Shearman’s South African Lawyers in Last-minute Talks To Find Jobs Before Closure
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250