Gaza: South Africa Deploys Star Barrister Line-Up to Bring Genocide Claim Against Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has countered South Africa's application before the ICJ, insisting that the Israeli army is "acting as morally as possible".
January 08, 2024 at 04:23 AM
3 minute read
The South African government has engaged barristers from prominent chambers within and outside the country to advance a case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), where it is accusing Israel of committing genocide in the ongoing war in Gaza.
South Africa had earlier instituted proceedings against Israel at the United Nations' highest court and the matter is expected to be heard in the Hague next week.
In its 84-page application, the African nation alleges that Israel has breached provisions of the 1984 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide in relation to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
"The acts and omissions by Israel are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnic group, that being the part of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip."
The alleged genocidal acts cited include "killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting on them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction".
It further states that are all the acts are attributable to Israel, which failed to prevent or punish "the direct and public incitement to genocide by senior Israeli officials and others" since the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas.
Among other requests, South Africa urged the international court to recognise the crimes committed and protect Palestinians against further harm.
But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had countered South Africa's application before the ICJ, insisting that the Israeli army is "acting as morally as possible".
At the public hearing scheduled for Thursday and Friday next week, both sides will be allotted two hours each to deliver their oral arguments, according to ICJ's arrangement.
On South Africa's legal team are barristers including John Dugard SC and Max du Plessis SC of Doughty Street Chambers, Adila Hassim SC from Thulamela Chambers and Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, according to a person with knowledge of the case. Also, notable U.K. barristers, Essex Court's Vaughan Lowe KC and Matrix Chambers' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC will serve as external counsel.
Ghralaigh had previously joined hundreds of U.K. solicitors and barristers who called on the British government to exert its influence to secure a ceasefire in Gaza via an open letter.
Details of Israel's legal representation remain sketchy but another top Essex Court's Barrister, Malcolm Shaw KC, is reported to be defending the nation at the ICJ next week. Shaw, a renowned international law expert, is yet to respond to requests for comment.
Likewise, some of the Barristers representing South Africa and their Chambers have yet to return Law.com International's request for comments while others asked that the request be directed to the country's international relations department.
Beyond the casualties recorded since the October 2023 attack, the Israel-Gaza crisis has caused a division in the legal industry with law firms and their partners taking different positions.
The chambers involved had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThreat of Trump Tariffs Is Sign Canada Needs to Wean Off Reliance on Trade with U.S., Trade Lawyers Say
5 minute readUK Sanctions Regime Put to the Test as Supreme Court Hears First ‘De-Designation’ Case Brought by Billionaire
'Headaches,' Opportunities Ahead for Corporate and Trade Lawyers Advising Foreign Businesses
4 minute readTrump's Second Term Sparks Unusual Alliances Between US and European Law Firms
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250