Gaza: South Africa Deploys Star Barrister Line-Up to Bring Genocide Claim Against Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has countered South Africa's application before the ICJ, insisting that the Israeli army is "acting as morally as possible".
January 08, 2024 at 04:23 AM
3 minute read
The South African government has engaged barristers from prominent chambers within and outside the country to advance a case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), where it is accusing Israel of committing genocide in the ongoing war in Gaza.
South Africa had earlier instituted proceedings against Israel at the United Nations' highest court and the matter is expected to be heard in the Hague next week.
In its 84-page application, the African nation alleges that Israel has breached provisions of the 1984 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide in relation to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
"The acts and omissions by Israel are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnic group, that being the part of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip."
The alleged genocidal acts cited include "killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting on them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction".
It further states that are all the acts are attributable to Israel, which failed to prevent or punish "the direct and public incitement to genocide by senior Israeli officials and others" since the October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas.
Among other requests, South Africa urged the international court to recognise the crimes committed and protect Palestinians against further harm.
But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had countered South Africa's application before the ICJ, insisting that the Israeli army is "acting as morally as possible".
At the public hearing scheduled for Thursday and Friday next week, both sides will be allotted two hours each to deliver their oral arguments, according to ICJ's arrangement.
On South Africa's legal team are barristers including John Dugard SC and Max du Plessis SC of Doughty Street Chambers, Adila Hassim SC from Thulamela Chambers and Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, according to a person with knowledge of the case. Also, notable U.K. barristers, Essex Court's Vaughan Lowe KC and Matrix Chambers' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC will serve as external counsel.
Ghralaigh had previously joined hundreds of U.K. solicitors and barristers who called on the British government to exert its influence to secure a ceasefire in Gaza via an open letter.
Details of Israel's legal representation remain sketchy but another top Essex Court's Barrister, Malcolm Shaw KC, is reported to be defending the nation at the ICJ next week. Shaw, a renowned international law expert, is yet to respond to requests for comment.
Likewise, some of the Barristers representing South Africa and their Chambers have yet to return Law.com International's request for comments while others asked that the request be directed to the country's international relations department.
Beyond the casualties recorded since the October 2023 attack, the Israel-Gaza crisis has caused a division in the legal industry with law firms and their partners taking different positions.
The chambers involved had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readFreshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readTikTok Faces European Commission Probe Over Alleged Meddling in Romanian Election
3 minute readHow Will M&A, Tech & Trump Shape Law Firm Growth in 2025? Global Leaders Share Their Insights
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250