America Voted. What's Next For Big Law?
It's difficult to predict what will happen once Donald Trump is sworn in as President of the United States but it's fairly certain that whatever he does, Big Law will be busy, the Global Lawyer writes.
November 10, 2024 at 10:50 PM
5 minute read
The world had no say in the outcome of the U.S. Presidential election last week. But it has to live with it.
There’s been no shortage of post-mortems since Donald Trump was elected to a second term as President of the United States following a tumultuous election, with pundits still parsing the results and pronouncing what they say about America.
But what do they mean for the rest of the world? And what about the legal world?
“Unpredictable” is the overarching conclusion. There is widespread agreement that Trump is both mercurial and transactional. So how much of his campaign rhetoric will translate into policy remains to be seen.
In the meantime, this is what we know: Lawyers will be busy.
Big Law dealmakers expect that this very “pro-business” President will reduce regulations and domestic oversight, lower corporate tax rates, and ease administrative burdens. This, says Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison chair Brad Karp, will fuel M&A activity and spur U.S. capital markets. Cross-border private equity deals also are likely to continue, lawyers say. At least that's the short-term scenario.
In the longer term, however, the international picture is a lot less clear. Trump, an isolationist-leaning leader who has espoused an “America First” policy, has promised to impose a “universal tariff” of at least 10% on all U.S. imports, and tariffs of 60% or more on products coming to the U.S. from China. For Trump, tariffs are the cure-all to what he sees as America’s decline, believing they will reverse decades of globalization, force factories to move back to the United States and reinvigorate manufacturing.
Both America’s allies and its rivals started preparing for this possibility months before the election. Knowing from his first term that Trump responds to fawning and flattery, many have already tried to ingratiate themselves with the incoming President, hoping he will use his tariff threats more as a negotiating tool than a blanket, across-the-board protectionist move. Lawyers say their clients are already seeking legal advice on how they might qualify for exceptions and carve-outs if tariffs are imposed.
But no one is taking chances.
The European Union has discussed how it might retaliate with tariffs of its own (it reportedly has compiled a list of American goods it could slap with reciprocal tariffs) and lawyers say it may adopt a stronger industrial policy to support European “champions” in such sectors as defense and energy, enabling it to effectively compete internationally.
Lawyers say top Europe-based law firms that with strong M&A practices would likely benefit from such a move. But they're not alone. European antitrust lawyers also would see an uptick in work if the EU, arguably the world’s toughest antitrust enforcer, decides to step up its already tough enforcement if it sees a Trump administration taking a less aggressive antitrust stance in mergers and acquisitions and in enforcement against U.S. companies doing business globally.
With all these shifts in U.S. trade and competition policy, clients are facing a period of uncertainty, Sidley Austin’s Brussels managing partner, Ken Daly, told EU reporter Linda Thompson last week. “We are expecting to be very busy,” he said.
There are plenty of other potential policy changes likely to impact lawyers and their clients. For example, what will become of the USMCA, the trade agreement between the U.S., Mexico and Canada, given that so many companies have shifted manufacturing from China to Mexico? Also, will Trump, who would rather focus on the United States, choose to ignore South America and Africa, even though China has been investing in their mining operations, which produce lithium and other valuable minerals? And how will the expected changes in U.S. energy policy affect companies in the Middle East?
China, the world’s second-largest economy, is, of course, Trump’s main target. It was Trump, after all, who started the trade war with China during his first term, and the rivalry between the two nations has only intensified since. But China, like Europe, is ready. It has built up its technology sector, putting a special focus on highly valuable semiconductors and chips. It reportedly has its own list of possible retaliatory tariffs, which would hurt US. business. It has invested heavily in Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America. It has improved relations with Japan, South Korea and Australia, all countries that could be hit hard by blanket U.S. tariffs. And it has flexed its muscle in the South China Sea, reminding the world that its military is strong—and Taiwan is on the table.
In other words, the world is preparing for multiple trade wars. And law firms’ international trade practices are likely to see demand for their services spike as clients look to “Trump-proof” their businesses.
But history has shown that trade wars don’t usually end well. Economists say broad-based tariffs increase prices for manufacturers and businesses that have to buy parts from abroad, and those higher prices are then passed on to consumers. And when countries retaliate, global supply chains are disrupted and long-standing alliances risk disappearing.
And while not directly related to the legal industry, there is a fear that Trump’s known admiration for leaders like Vladimir Putin, Viktor Orban, Benjamin Netanyahu and even Xi Jinping, could lead to more global chaos, whether in Ukraine, Gaza and the occupied West Bank, Taiwan, or elsewhere in the world. Investors don't like instability and uncertainty. All this turmoil could eventually reduce global M&A activity—the bread and butter of Big Law.
The world's elite law firms, as strong and influential as they may be, cannot control what happens now. What they can do is manage risk, both for their clients—the businesses that keep global economies running—and for themselves.
It’s going to be a wild and exhausting four years.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRopes & Gray Registers Paris Services Company Amid Talk of France Office Launch
2 minute readPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
DLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 2Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 3'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 4Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 5The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250