Newly-Appointed Kirkland Clinches Victory at Supreme Court in Longrunning Sky Feud
Lawyers say the judgment had been highly anticipated because it had the potential to deviate from settled EU case law on what constitutes bad faith registrations of a trade mark.
November 14, 2024 at 06:15 AM
3 minute read
A newly-instructed Kirkland & Ellis team has clinched victory at the U.K.'s Supreme Court following almost a decade of litigation involving telecoms giant Sky and U.S. cloud-based email migration company, SkyKick.
Kirkland, headed up by partner Steven Baldwin, took over from U.K. Top 50 firm Fieldfisher as SkyKick's legal representatives at the Supreme Court in September, following the Seattle-based company's acquistion by another U.S. IT platform, ConnectWise.
The final judgment saw five supreme court judges, presided by Lord Reed, overturn a previous Court of Appeal ruling and concluded that Sky had indeed acted in bad faith when it applied its trademark in categories of goods and services.
Sky, advised by Mishcon de Reya, initially claimed back in 2016 that SkyKick had infringed five of its trademarks, including the ‘SKY’ trademark by using ‘SkyKick’ in relation to their own products, using a combination of European Union trademarks as well as U.K. ones.
After the High Court initially found in favour of then Fieldfisher-advised SkyKick, the case was taken to the Court of Appeal in 2021 which concluded that the procedure adopted by the original judge had been “unfair”, and found that the telecommunications company had not acted in bad faith either.
Fieldfisher partner John Linneker previously led the case for SkyKick. However, the firm confirmed it was no longer legal counsel for SkyKick since its acquisition by ConnectWise.
In its ruling on Wednesday however, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the High Court had been “right” in the first instance, and the Court of Appeal was “wrong to reverse that finding.”
Nevertheless, this decision is unlikely to change much in practice, as SkyKick had decided to rebranded following its acquisition earlier this year. A spokesperson from SkyKick said: "In September 2024 Sky and SkyKick settled their trade mark disputes before the U.K. Court and the EU Intellectual Property Office, in advance of the Supreme Court making a draft judgment available to them, or a decision in the EU cases. SkyKick has, following its acquisition by ConnectWise on 10 September 2024, decided to re-brand. Both parties determined that their respective interests would be best served by concluding these long running disputes."
From an IP perspective however the decision also confirms that, despite withdrawal from the EU, the U.K. “maintains designation of these courts as E.U. trademark courts.
Commenting on the impact of this decision, head of U.K. IP at Ashurst partner Sunny Kumar, explained: "This judgment was highly anticipated because it had the potential to deviate from settled EU case law on what constitutes bad faith registrations of a trade mark. The effect of this would have seen the first significant divergences between U.K. and EU law in the field of intellectual property since Brexit. However the Supreme Court has in most part upheld the High Court's decision and thus has not deviated from settled EU case law.”
Mishcon did not respond to requests for comment at the time of publication.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIsraeli Firm Pearl Cohen Combines with San Francisco IP Boutique
Birkenstocks: Footwear or Fine Art? German Law Firm SKW Schwarz Steps Up in Court
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 2Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 3A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 4Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 5Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250