Bird & Bird enters Korea via partnership with local firm
Bird & Bird has become the latest international law firm to enter Korea after signing a cooperation agreement with Seoul-based outfit Hwang Mok Park (HMP). The non-exclusive partnership will allow the two firms to participate in joint marketing and collaboration of client services, with a view to a more formal merger in the next two to three years.
February 24, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Bird & Bird has become the latest international law firm to enter Korea after signing a cooperation agreement with Seoul-based outfit Hwang Mok Park (HMP).
The non-exclusive partnership will allow the two firms to participate in joint marketing and collaboration of client services, with a view to a more formal merger in the next two to three years.
Kun-Su Mok, managing partner of HMP, will lead on the ground in Korea, while joint activity on the Bird & Bird side will be overseen by China chairman Justin Walkey alongside its head of the communications, media and technology (CMT) group in Hong Kong and China, Marcus Vass.
Bird & Bird currently has between 75 and 100 Korean clients but with no one partner in charge of the practice.
David Kerr, CEO of the firm, said the aim of the cooperation was to tap the Korean market for more corporate, dispute resolution and IP work, on both the inbound and outbound side as the economy continues to grow.
"We think Korea is one of the most important economies in Asia," he added. "We've seen a lot of growth.
"We are interested in increasing the amount of inbound work into Korea but also the amount of outbound work for a bigger range of clients coming out."
The UK-headquartered firm first revealed its plans to venture into Seoul in an interview with Legal Week in April last year, having identified particularly lucrative opportunities in areas such as intellectual property and technology, where the firm specialises.
The launch fits in with its wider plan to grow its Asia practice to account for 20% of firmwide revenues and lawyer headcount over the next three to five years, up from 15% presently.
In March it signed a similar cooperation agreement with Sydney law firm Truman Hoyle, which it also hopes to extend to a full merger in due course.
In Malaysia it has a tie up with Tay & Partners and in China with Lawjay Partners.
It also has offices in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing, while it has a further base in Singapore through its global association with ATMD Bird & Bird.
Asked why the firm had chosen the cooperation model for Korea, Kerr said it would allow partners to get a better understanding of client requirements.
"Having analysed the Korean market we came to the conclusion that the best for us was to enter into a cooperation. We preferred that to the foreign legal consultant route that other firms have gone down.
"We feel very strongly that we need help to understand the psychology and culture of clients, so this is a great advantage for us.
"For now there will be no profit sharing – just trying to coordinate client services. But yes we would like the relationship to develop and get closer as regulation and time permits."
South Korea, Asia's fourth largest economy, has attracted a significant amount of interest from international law firms in the last two years following the liberalisation of its legal market.
Currently there are 18 foreign outfits with offices in Seoul, including Linklaters, Clifford Chance, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
For UK firms there have been some barriers to entry due to rules which require the chief representative of the Korean office to have qualified in the firm's home jurisdiction and practised there for at least three years.
However, a number of British outfits, including Ashurst and Stephenson Harwood, continue to show interest in the market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Skadden to Close in Shanghai and Make Cuts to China Corporate Practice
Pinsent Masons Hires DLA Piper M&A Partner as Part of Growth Strategy
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250