UK firms' right to practise in Korea at risk post Brexit
UK firms are operating in Korea under EU free trade agreement, putting the offices at risk in the event of Brexit
June 28, 2016 at 11:12 AM
3 minute read
UK firms' offices in Korea could be under threat as a result of Britain's decision to leave the European Union.
European firms are currently only able to practise in the country under an EU free trade agreement, with the Brexit vote therefore calling this position into question.
A group of Seoul-based UK lawyers met on Monday to discuss the impact of the vote on their right to operate in the country.
The firms decided to make a joint approach to the UK embassy in Korea to discuss what happens next and the possibility of creating a bilateral trade agreement between the UK and Korea.
If the UK were to leave the EU before a bilateral agreement along similar lines to the 2011 EU/Korea Free Trade Agreement they may lose their right to practise in Korea.
"The offices were set up under the EU Korea FTA. If the UK is outside the EU then our licence could be revoked," said one partner based in Seoul.
Stephenson Harwood's Seoul manging partner Michael Kim said: "We have contacted the attaché of the UK embassy in Seoul but that is the only thing we have done. We think it is better to wait until the dust settles – there is a no point in a knee-jerk reaction."
The UK ambassador to Korea has spoken to the Korean press stating his support for a bilateral trade agreement and emphasising that in the short term the relationship between the two countries should not change.
Allen & Overy Korea managing partner Matthias Voss said: "As you would imagine there is quite a lot of discussion [about the position of UK firms in Korea] but whatever happens is two to three years off."
In addition Voss said A&O remains committed to Korea and has no plans to change its presence, but will "continue to monitor what will happen".
Discussions around Brexit are the latest in a series of talks on Korea's legal services liberalisation.
In January the UK ambassador to Korea and his US and EU counterparts made representations to the Korean parliamentary and judiciary committee arguing that the current law allowing international firms to operate in Korea has failed to live up to the commitments made under the free trade agreements, as firms cannot hold a majority stake in joint ventures.
Seoul has seen a wave of international firms launching since it first opened its doors to foreign law firms. Allen & Overy, White & Case and Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy all opened in Seoul last year and there are now 26 international firms operating in the city with several more rumoured to be considering entering the market.
In February Latham & Watkins announced plans to open in Seoul after submitting an application to set up a foreign legal consultant office.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNuix Discover Named a Leader in SoftwareReview's eDiscovery Solutions Data Quadrant for the Second Consecutive Year
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250