Australia's MinterEllison ventures into IT consulting with takeover of advisory firm
Firm continues expansion outside of law with acquisition of Sydney-based technology advisory firm ITNewcom
July 05, 2017 at 05:19 AM
2 minute read
MinterEllison has acquired an information technology consulting firm in Sydney, as the Australian firm continues its path to provide multidisciplinary advisory services to clients.
The firm has acquired ITNewcom, which advises corporate and government clients on technology strategies, IT outsourcing, cost-benefit analysis and risk management. According to its website, ITNewcom's clients include BHP Billiton, The Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, and federal and state government agencies across the country.
Andrew Cunningham, the firm's innovation and networks leader, said that ITNewcom aligned with the firm's strategic vision. "Joining ITNewcom's complementary expertise with our existing…technology practice will allow us to deliver seamless integrated consulting and legal solutions to clients seeking sophisticated technology outcomes," he said.
ITNewcom, which was founded in 1997, is led by chief executive Brendan Welsh, and firm leadership also includes partners Debbie McLaughlin, Stephen Craike and Simon Lewis in Australia, and Kim Gordon in New Zealand.
It will now become part of a newly launched technology consulting practice at MinterEllison that also comprises partners Anthony Lloyd in Sydney, Paul Kallenbach in Melbourne and Amanda Story in Canberra.
MinterEllison has made a series of efforts to expand into advisory practice beyond law, especially under the leadership of chief executive Tony Harrington, former PwC Australia chief, who joined the firm in 2014.
Last year, MinterEllison also branched into executive remuneration consulting by hiring a four-consultant team from London-based advisory firm Willis Towers Watson. In March, the firm's New Zealand affiliated firm MinterEllisonRuddWatts launched a joint venture with Auckland-based technology investment firm Goat Ventures to develop an artificial intelligence system for document review.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPinsent Masons Launches AML Artificial Intelligence Tool in Wake of SRA Crackdown
3 minute readGowling WLG’s Commitment to AI and Innovation Attracts New Director of AI
4 minute readWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Trending Stories
- 1When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 2New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 3'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 4About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 5Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250