Mishcon de Reya and Pinsent Masons take up lead roles on Google privacy breach dispute
Litigation funder Therium Capital Management has backed the case against the internet giant
November 30, 2017 at 06:44 AM
3 minute read
Mishcon de Reya is advising a group led by the former executive director of consumer group Which?, Richard Lloyd, in a class action lawsuit against internet giant Google.
The group, named Google You Owe Us, alleges that Google breached the UK Data Protection Act by bypassing privacy settings on Apple phones to track the behaviour of people using the Safari browser.
The privacy bypass, which has been termed the 'Safari Workaround', allowed Google to collect information that was used by its DoubleClick advertising business to target content towards a user's browsing habits, the claimants argue.
The claimants said the breach took place between June 2011 and February 2012 and could have affected 5.4 million people, who could be eligible to make a claim against Google.
Mishcon dispute resolution partner James Oldnall is acting for Lloyd, while Pinsent Masons is acting for Google, with a team led by technology, media and telecoms disputes partner David Barker.
Oldnall told Legal Week: "Data is a new currency in the new economy and we are slowly waking up to the ways that tech giants make their revenues off the back of our data. If you don't understand how you are paying for the service, it is because you are the product. Google is not some benign entity, you pay it through the use of your data.
"From a procedural perspective, representative action is a longstanding part of English civil procedure, but this is the first time a representative action has been used in a modern context against a tech giant due to a data breach. If we are successful, I would like to think that it can be used more commonly to hold tech giants to account in relation to data breaches."
Lloyd secured funding for the action through litigation funder Therium Capital Management, which has previously backed actions against Volkswagen during the emissions scandal and an action against European truck manufacturers over price fixing.
Oldnall has instructed Oliver Campbell QC of Henderson Chambers, Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix Chambers and Victoria Wakefield of Brick Court Chambers to advise on the case.
A Google spokesperson said: "This is not new – we have defended similar cases before. We don't believe it has any merit and we will contest it."
Earlier this year, the technology company turned to longstanding advisor Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton on a deal to buy the HTC engineering team behind the Pixel smartphone from Taiwanese smartphone maker HTC.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGermany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readAustralian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Samsung Flooded with Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in US Court
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250