Male partners question 'hypocritical backlash' over men-only events as women set out grim reality of City networking
Male and female partners air their views as part of Legal Week's Big Question survey on corporate events
February 01, 2018 at 04:49 AM
5 minute read
In the wake of last week's Presidents Club scandal, we surveyed more than 250 partners to find out their views on the issues around male-focused corporate events and whether they think law firms should be doing more to make networking activities more inclusive.
The results highlight significant differences in how men and women perceive the problem. The strength of feeling among women about the need for change was overwhelming, with 97% saying law firms need to try harder to make corporate networking activities more inclusive.
However, many male respondents insisted there is no issue to address, with more than 50% saying the profession does not have a problem with corporate events being too focused on men.
Here are some of the anonymous responses we received from male lawyers:
- "I find this outrage absolutely hypocritical – did no hen party ever hire a male stripper? I would disapprove of that, but have no objection in a free society to whatever other people want to do."
- "The industry is full of female-only events. These events outnumber male-only events by more than five to one. Law firms organise female-only events all the time and never organise male-only events as they are afraid of criticism. There is a stereotypical perception that only men misbehave in men-only events. Women actually on average misbehave much more than men in their events and nobody comments on that."
- "Society is getting too judgmental and uptight. Relax. Let people enjoy themselves. Women are adults. They can make their own minds what they will and will not do, and it's patronising and infantilising to act as if they need protection from the big bad men. Have you ever seen a pack of women at a hen night with a male stripper? It makes most men look like prudes."
- "If men-only events are to be banned, then women-only events must also be banned. On the same basis, if men-only groups or associations are not permitted, women-only groups and associations should also not be permitted."
- "Unfortunately, it seems that people cannot see this in proportion. The Presidents Club dinner was an event which everyone involved has attended voluntarily, and are free to leave, at which there were some problems caused by a few people who drank too much and behaved very badly. Most people there didn't see or hear any of the alleged behaviour reported on by journalists, who went there in search of a story and were no doubt determined to come away with one. But if I was invited by a client to a football match where a few drunken fans misbehaved, should I be admonished or lose my job? I don't see the difference. Yes, it appears this was a tasteless event, but so is a Britney Spears concert (and she sings in her underwear)."
In contrast, some of the comments from female survey respondents highlight the scale of the problem still facing women in law when it comes to networking events
- "I have not only been taken to strip clubs – I have been taken to bars full of prostitutes, I have had friends who have been assaulted, and when I was a young lawyer my partner encouraged me to go and 'have breakfast' at a client's hotel after a late signing – the client evidently thought I was the signing bonus. When will we hear #metoo in the law firms? I have absolutely had enough."
- "I have been to events where the men went on to a strip club. I was invited along but declined to go. The issue of male-only events is the tip of a huge iceberg: there is a massive and pervasive issue in the legal profession around gender pay discrepancies, and a lack of women in management roles. Women are not visible in positions of power and so the climate of discrimination and harassment is not called out. Male law firm leaders seem completely unwilling to take the issue seriously. When we discussed the Presidents Club scandal, many of my male partners could not understand what the issue was. We have come to accept these types of events as being part of corporate life in the City."
- "Strip clubs are a big no – having been to one as a trainee and a newly qualified lawyer and ending up in a cab crying about how awful it was, I believe this should definitely not be a form of corporate entertainment."
- "My personal career highlight was being told by the bar steward at a golf club where my firm was holding a partners golf day that I could not go into the bar where my fellow partners were having pre-dinner drinks. It was a male-only bar. As one of only two female golfing partners, we were allowed to have a drink in the lounge – on our own. No one thought to check in advance and no one challenged it. Biggest irony – I was the winner of the event!"
- "Alcohol plays a crucial role in predominantly male events, and more often than not leads to behaviour we would not normally tolerate in any other setting. Events become very blokey and are a real turn-off for other guests. I know that many firms turn a blind eye to poor behaviour in the name of networking. If a valuable client behaves badly, so what?"
- "Events such as the President's Club highlight the sheer disrespect that the majority of men have for women, whether or not they claim to believe in equality. Get them in a room together where women are perceived to be in a subservient role and the men are out to impress each other and they behave like a testosterone-fuelled pack of wolves. This behaviour is rife."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/f6/62f476814a4bbe57b17e0afd2bdd/deepseek-app-4-767x633.jpg)
DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute read![What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/04/Moscow-Russia-767x633.jpg)
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250