Dealmaker: BLP's Rupert Ticehurst on black cab disputes, spiky lawyers and 'exotic' Edam cheese
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) private client litigation head Rupert Ticehurst has been at the firm since 2011 when he joined from Herbert Smith Freehills,…
February 07, 2018 at 05:23 AM
4 minute read
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) private client litigation head Rupert Ticehurst has been at the firm since 2011 when he joined from Herbert Smith Freehills, and was last year named as one of the Private Client Global Elite 2017.
Last year he advised on a trademark dispute over the shape of London black cabs, securing a Court of Appeal victory for Frazer-Nash and Ecotive, allowing them to begin production of their environmentally-friendly Metrocab after a passing-off challenge by the London Taxi Company.
Why did you become a litigator? I play chess.
What's the closest you have come to doing something other than law? In my dreams I am a world-class long distance runner, but in the real world I have genuinely never thought about doing anything other than law.
Why work in a law firm rather than become a barrister? I am a huge fan of the independent Bar and the specialist knowledge and advocacy skills it offers solicitors but, while I admire many barristers, I am very happy that I am not a barrister.
Which judge or barrister do you most admire and why? We have a remarkable judiciary which in my experience is consistently fair, professional, incorruptible and of the highest standard, and we should never take the enormous public service judges provide for granted.
What's been your proudest professional moment? Winning the taxi litigation. The new green Metrocab can now go into production, which will transform London's air quality, so we (the BLP team) feel we have not just won a legal dispute, we have also won a major environmental victory.
…and worst day on the job? The day my client tragically murdered his wife and killed himself – that was as bad as it gets and was a stark reminder of how grim life can be.
What advice would you give to young litigators starting out? If you are agreeable and collaborative, doors will open for you; if you are rude and aggressive, they will be slammed in your face.
How do litigators differ from deal lawyers? I would like to say that litigators are smarter, but in practice a good dealmaker is very similar to a good litigator: both have to manage a team of lawyers, have the ability to see around corners and work towards an agreed objective overcoming all the obstacles which will be thrown their way, for a client who may be justifiably demanding.
How much do you conform to the spiky litigator stereotype? Not at all. Spikiness inhibits progress, which is not in a client's interests.
What's the toughest ethical/moral dilemma your job has ever presented you with? Giving a client the right advice, which I know will result in my being replaced by a lawyer who will give the client the wrong advice.
What most annoys you about the legal profession? Other lawyers, particularly those who watch too much American television and so think they should behave like Rottweilers.
What's your strongest characteristic… and worst trait? I have consulted at home and I am told that my strongest characteristic is that I am principled and fair; according to my daughter I have no faults, but my wife did, surprisingly readily, suggest that I can be a little impatient (and it appears that she is not the only person who thinks that). Come on! I haven't got all day, next question…
What's the worst corporate event you've ever attended? Watching an England friendly at Wembley.
Most memorable case you ever have worked on and why? The owners of the Metrocab produce a range of electric vehicles and have a test track; it was imperative that we spent lots of time testing the vehicles.
Do you see yourself having a career outside law? I would quite like to drive a bus.
What's your favourite TV depiction of a litigation lawyer? Harvey Specter from Suits – I think they based his character on me.
What's your favourite item of clothing? My Proviz cycling jacket, which turns me into a beacon when I cycle home at night.
What's your favourite cheese? I have an affection for Edam because as a child I thought that it was very exotic.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
The EU Top 30, 2024: Ranking the Largest Law Firms in the European Union by Headcount
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 12 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 2Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
- 3Rule of Law: Is Big Law Too Shortsighted?
- 4The Empty Promise of ‘Dubin v. United States’
- 5Weil Partner Exits Raise Questions About Future Firm Leadership
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250