Ministry of Defence cuts legal spend to top billing advisers as magic circle firms see fees fall
Linklaters, Freshfields and Slaughters among advisers to see MoD billings fall last year
February 21, 2018 at 05:42 AM
3 minute read
Legal fees for the Ministry of Defence's (MoD) biggest billers fell by more than 80% last year, as the government department cut back on spending to top UK law firms.
Figures obtained by a freedom of information request show the MoD's five biggest-billing law firms were paid 84% less in 2016-17 than the previous financial year.
Linklaters, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Slaughter and May, Simmons & Simmons and Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) – the five biggest MoD billers since 2013-14 looking at combined earnings – were paid a total of just £1.7m last year, compared with £10.6m in 2015-16.
Linklaters – the top-billing MoD adviser since 2013-14 – has been paid £13m in legal fees by the MoD in the last four financial years, but while it billed an average of more than £4m a year between 2013-14 and 2015-16, last year the firm earned just £852,000.
The magic circle firm has advised the MoD on numerous projects in recent years, including the production of the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers (pictured). The two warships will be the biggest ever built for the Royal Navy.
Simmons, the second highest-billing law firm over the same period, has earned a total of £8.3m for its advice, but also saw a significant drop in fees last year from £3.5m in 2015-16 to just £17,334. The firm has also handled a number of high-profile mandates for the ministry in recent years, including the financing for a training package that involved the delivery of a range of helicopters, infrastructure and ground-based training equipment.
HSF is the third highest UK top 50 biller during the period at £7.3m, followed by Freshfields on £4.4m and Slaughters with £3.2m.
In December 2014, the MoD appointed 10 firms to its major projects panel, with Linklaters, Simmons, HSF and Freshfields among those winning places. Between them, Linklaters and Simmons have billed more since then – £21.4m – than all other firms on the panel combined (£19.5m).
However, some of the smaller firms on the panel saw their MoD billings increase in 2016-17, including Mills & Reeve, which was the biggest earner from the MoD last year, billing £1.4m from the department, nearly £1m more than it did in 2015-16. Burges Salmon also saw an upturn in MoD fees last year, earning £621,378 after billing an average of about £150,000 in the previous years.
Despite not being a panel firm, Slaughters has been paid more by the MoD than the majority of the other firms on the major projects roster.
Other non-panel firms to have billed more than £1m during the past three years include BLM (£2m), Squire Patton Boggs (£2.2m) and Scots firm Morton Fraser (£1.9m).
In a statement, the MoD said: "It may be helpful to explain some of the reasons that potentially give rise to a variation in legal costs on a yearly basis. These will include, but are not limited to, the fact that procurement projects require more support at certain stages than others and the number of projects may either increase or decrease over the years.
"Additionally, last year the MoD switched to a new commercial procurement system, which may have caused a delay in some payments being submitted and processed. Overall, however, the MoD external legal support is only sought when there is a business requirement that cannot be met internally."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
3 minute readLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Clifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250