Norton Rose Fulbright and Chadbourne settle sex bias case with $1m payout to ex-partner
Deal resolves discrimination claims brought by three female lawyers against Chadbourne and merger partner Norton Rose Fulbright
March 14, 2018 at 01:01 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Chadbourne & Parke and its merger partner Norton Rose Fulbright have agreed to settle a high-profile gender discrimination case brought by three former female partners, according to newly filed court papers.
To resolve the claims under the Equal Pay Act, the defendants will pay $1m to former Chadbourne partner Kerrie Campbell, $750,000 to New York of counsel Mary Yelenick and $250,000 to former Ukrainian partner Jaroslawa Johnson, as well as $1.08m in lawyer fees to plaintiffs firm Sanford Heisler Sharp.
The court papers do not disclose the entirety of the settlement. While the financial settlements – totalling more than $3m – resolve the plaintiffs' Equal Pay Act claims, there are "separate agreements that resolve all of plaintiffs' remaining claims against defendants," said plaintiffs attorney David Sanford, founding partner of Sanford Heisler, in a filing.
Among the 24 counts alleged in their complaint, only four relate to the Equal Pay Act. The complaint also asserts the defendants violated city, state and federal discrimination and retaliation laws, and it asserts breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.
The suit against Chadbourne has been the most prominent in a series of recent cases related to the gap in pay between male and female partners at big law firms, including a case brought by a former partner at now-defunct Sedgwick and another case brought by the same plaintiffs firm against Proskauer Rose.
In a statement, plaintiffs attorney Alexandra Harwin, a partner at Sanford Heisler, said: "We're pleased that the parties have resolved the plaintiffs' claims under the Equal Pay Act and are hopeful the court will approve the settlements."
She declined to comment about the terms of settlement for the other claims in the suit.
In a statement, a Norton Rose Fulbright spokesman said the motion is pending with the court and "we are hopeful that it will be granted". He declined to comment further.
Campbell originally brought the suit in 2016 as a $100m proposed class action complaint. Sanford Heisler said the suit was brought on behalf of lead plaintiff Campbell and about 26 current and former female Chadbourne partners.
The lawsuit alleged Chadbourne was run by an "all-male dictatorship" that pays women partners less and provides them fewer leadership opportunities than men. The suit alleged that female partners were paid less and receive smaller bonuses than their male counterparts and have been excluded from positions with decision-making authority.
The plaintiffs were suing Chadbourne and individual leading partners in the firm, including Abbe Lowell, Marc Alpert, Andrew Giaccia, Howard Seife, Lawrence Rosenberg and Paul Weber.
The road to settlement
The litigation became publicly acrimonious as Chadbourne filed counterclaims and the number of parties grew. Norton Rose Fulbright, which acquired Chadbourne in June 2017, was added as a defendant last October, while Johnson, a former Kiev office managing partner, petitioned to join the suit in 2016 and Yelenick, a former chairwoman of Chadbourne's products liability group in New York, joined last year.
Chadbourne and Norton Rose Fulbright have faced several obstacles in the last several months, potentially increasing the plaintiffs' leverage.
The settlement comes about five months after a US District Judge Paul Oetken in Manhattan shot down Chadbourne's motions for summary judgment and to dismiss class and collective action claims, as well as denying competing claims by the plaintiffs.
Oetken in October ordered limited discovery to determine if the three former Chadbourne partners deserve protection as employees under employment laws, or if their former status as partial owners of the firm disqualifies them from bringing the suit.
As part of that discovery, Chadbourne has handed over some of the firm's most sensitive and confidential documents, including partner compensation information and the internal communications of the firm's management committee. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses has ordered the individual defendants to search their personal email accounts for relevant documents.
Amid discovery last October, plaintiffs' attorneys hinted that a fourth plaintiff could enter the case, asserting that if the parties can't "reach prompt resolution", the plaintiffs will seek to add her. In the end, a fourth plaintiff was not added. Court records show the parties did reach a settlement in principle for two plaintiffs just weeks after Sanford made the disclosure in court.
In court documents, Sanford said the "settlements were only achieved after hard-fought and protracted negotiations" between counsel and a JAMS mediator, Dina Jansenson. Proskauer Rose partners Kathleen McKenna and Evandro Gigante represented Chadbourne, while Steven Bierman, partner of Sidley Austin, represented Norton Rose.
- Submissions are now being accepted for the Transatlantic Legal Awards 2018, which recognise excellence in transatlantic legal work, as well as innovation, pro bono work, strategic thinking and in-house excellence. The winners will be announced at a gala dinner in London on 14 June. Click here for more information on the event.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250