US and Dutch firms advise on Carlyle's €10bn acquisition of Akzo Nobel's chemicals business
Latham acts opposite De Brauw as Dutch multinational evades takeover by rival
March 27, 2018 at 12:21 PM
2 minute read
Latham & Watkins and Proskauer Rose are among a clutch of law firms to have taken roles on the Carlyle Group's €10.1bn (£8.9bn) acquisition of Akzo Nobel's speciality chemicals business.
The Dutch paints and chemicals multinational announced today (27 March) that it had reached agreement with the US private equity firm and its longstanding investment partner GIC, the sovereign wealth fund of Singapore.
Akzo first announced plans to sell the business in April last year in a bid to evade a takeover from rival PPG Industries.
Latham is advising Carlyle with a corporate deal team led by London partner Michael Bond and Washington DC partner David Dantzic. It also includes Washington partner Marc Granger and New York partner Steven Betensky.
The US firm is also providing finance advice with a Washington DC-based team comprising capital markets partners Patrick Shannon and Jason Licht, and leveraged finance partners Jeffrey Chenard and Manu Gayatrinath.
It is understood that Carlyle has also instructed Dutch firm Loyens & Loeff, which is fielding a team led by senior corporate partners Bas Vletter and Harmen Holtrop.
Proskauer is acting for GIC with a team led by corporate partner Matt Rees that also included co-head of M&A Ronald Papa in New York.
Meanwhile, Akzo is being advised by Slaughter and May's Dutch best friend firm De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. Slaughters also has a relationship with Akzo, and advised on its 2008 takeover of Imperial Chemical Industries.
The deal is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to be concluded before the end of the year.
In 2015, Latham acted alongside Allen & Overy and Alston & Bird on Carlyle's $8bn purchase of Veritas following the software company's split from Symantec. On that deal, Latham advised on the debt financing aspects, while A&O acted for Carlyle on the non-US aspects of the deal. Symantec turned to Baker McKenzie and Fenwick & West.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Ropes & Gray, Willkie Farr, KWM, Dechert Act on Xerox's $1.5B Buy in China
Freshfields, MoFo Act on $1.8B TOPPAN Deal As Japan's US Buying Spree Continues
Cox & Palmer to Merge with Benson Buffett in St. John’s, Canada’s Easternmost City
2 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Some of 2024's Most Notable GC Moves Were Drenched in Drama
- 2Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'?
- 3Wholesale Real Estate Transaction Transparency and Protection Act Takes Effect Jan. 4: What You Need to Know
- 4Decision of the Day: 'Attorney's Eyes Only' Protective Order Denied; Good Cause Not Demonstrated
- 5The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
