Clifford Chance aims to break away from 'terribly unpredictable' pricing with new AI tool
New tech helps to work out how long lawyers should spend on tasks to better predict pricing
April 06, 2018 at 05:46 AM
4 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) is in the final stages of piloting new artificial intelligence (AI) software that will help work out how long lawyers should be spending on tasks in order to better predict pricing.
The firm is currently testing the tool, called Clocktimizer, in Amsterdam, in one of its 'best delivery hubs', which encourage teams to find more efficient ways of serving their clients.
The software can be used to analyse both historic and current timesheet data, enabling the firm to generate more accurate fee quotes.
CC plans to formally launch the tool this summer once its eight-month pilot has finished. The first stage is expected to see it rolled out across several practices in Europe, including London.
The technology is likely to be particularly useful for the litigation practice, where it could offer more pricing certainty to clients on long-running investigations.
CC global litigation head Matthew Newick, who took over from Jeremy Sandelson in January 2018, said: "A traditional response for a litigator is to suck their teeth and say the work is terribly unpredictable. That's not good enough anymore. We need to be good at telling clients how much our work will cost and then committing to how much it will cost."
Other law firms to have used Clocktimizer technology include Allen & Overy, Hogan Lovells and CMS.
Newick added that the "main attraction" of the tool is its ability to analyse historical data, which he thinks will enable CC to tell clients how much particular pieces of new work should cost.
"The whole driver for this is pricing and transparency. If we know how long a task has typically taken in the past, we can better predict how long it will take in the future. With this information, we can offer clients greater certainty when it comes to pricing our work.
"Within our time recording system, we have a whole bunch of information about what our lawyers do on a daily basis and how long these things typically take, all within those time narratives that our lawyers produce so assiduously each day."
The rollout is a key priority for Newick, who has earmarked 'best delivery' as a key component of his strategy for the practice.
On assuming his new role, he appointed New York white-collar partner Rob Houck as global litigation and dispute resolution best delivery partner.
Another priority for Newick is the firm's new 400-lawyer cross practice technology team. The group was pulled together in December to meet growing client demand for legal advice around technology and the regulation of data.
Houck has appointed Washington disputes partner Megan Gordon as the global lead for technology in the litigation practice.
Commenting on the appointments, Newick said: "I have asked Rob to focus his thinking on 'best delivery' globally to help me make sure we are developing as fast as we can in this area, increasing the pace of change. That new global role reflects the importance that I attach to this issue.
"Megan's role is similar in the sense that that's all about the other side of technology, which is helping clients deal with the risks that emerge from the incredibly rapid development of technology. We thought we needed a dedicated global partner to concentrate on that."
- Clifford Chance legal technology solutions director Anthony Vigneron is among the speakers at this year's Strategic Technology Forum, which will take place in Italy this June. Subjects on the agenda include AI, the war for tech-savvy millennial talent, and how to react to a public hacking. Click here for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Inadvertent Disclosures Happen at a Law Firm, Who Is Responsible?
Canadians Mourn the Loss of Two Esteemed Legal Professionals: Alan Young and Jason Moyse
4 minute readLawyers Should Only Use AI For Low-end Tasks, Regulators in Australia Say
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250