SRA opens investigation into Dentons amid questions over dismissal of HR manager on maternity leave
Regulator confirms investigation after employment tribunal rules against firm for dismissing recruitment manager
April 20, 2018 at 10:09 AM
2 minute read
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has opened an investigation into Dentons over an employment discrimination case filed against the firm.
The investigation relates to a dispute between Dentons and Bina Hale, a former recruitment manager at the firm's Milton Keynes office, which was heard last year.
Hale, who was fired by the firm in January 2017, claimed that she was discriminated against for taking maternity leave and was "subjected to detriment" and unfairly dismissed.
In December last year an employment tribunal in Bury St Edmunds ruled in favour of Hale, stating that there was no consultation with her prior to the decision being made, and that she was "pre-selected" for redundancy as she had been absent on maternity leave.
In a statement, Dentons said that while the firm "fundamentally disagreed" with the tribunal's decision, it had conducted an internal investigation to ensure that the staff named in the decision had not behaved improperly.
The firm said: "Consistent with our regulatory obligations we informed the SRA about this investigation and, to assist them with their own review of this matter, voluntarily shared our report with the SRA. We expect the SRA to conclude that review within the next few weeks."
Hale's dismissal was also called into question by the tribunal's finding that Suzanne Barnes, a human resources business partner at Dentons, had destroyed notes from a meeting at which Hale was selected for redundancy. With regards to Barnes' credibility, the judgment asked: "Why would she do that? Was she hiding something?"
As there were no recorded notes of the scoring system used to determine who would be made redundant, the judgment stated that this gave an "impression something was being hidden […] or deliberately fudged".
A spokesperson for the SRA confirmed that that it was "collating all relevant information before deciding on any next steps".
Dentons added: "Diversity and inclusion are both very important priorities for the firm. We recently reviewed our maternity policy to ensure it is aligned with market best practice, and have also enhanced our family-friendly policies to support working parents in various ways with both work-related and personal family challenges. We are committed to a workplace free from discrimination."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250