EDF Energy cuts back UK legal panel by 40% as two firms win new appointments
Energy company brings in fixed fee 'shopping list' as panel is streamlined to eight firms
April 26, 2018 at 04:18 AM
4 minute read
EDF Energy has cut the number of firms on its UK roster by 40%, with CMS and Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) winning new appointments.
The line-up now consists of eight law firms, down from 14.
The other six firms on the panel, all of which been reappointed, are Baker McKenzie, Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF), Pinsent Masons, Eversheds Sutherland, Squire Patton Boggs and Burges Salmon.
Chief legal officer Guido Santi led the review, which began in mid-2017 and concluded in March this year. The new panel arrangement will be in place for a two-year period until 2020.
As part of the review, EDF has also introduced a new approach to assigning work to its panel firms as part of a move away from the billable hour and a desire for greater transparency over legal spend.
The company has collated a list of tasks, known internally as its 'shopping list', for which it is most likely to instruct external law firms, and asked each firm to provide it with fixed fees in relation to each task.
Santi said: "This means that when we are presented with these tasks, we are able to assess if they are worth outsourcing, and what we will need to budget for. We expect this approach will reduce negotiations on fees and means that our panel firms can spend less time and resource preparing quotes and responses to mini-tenders, so it should be a win-win."
He added that the company has been working on an efficiency drive against a backdrop of "fast-evolving industry challenges, such as a very competitive market for energy providers, a proposed cap on standard variable tariffs, a challenging wholesale energy market and Brexit."
He said EDF had reduced the legal panel as it felt a smaller number of panel firms would help it get "effective, strategic legal advice, and cost efficiencies". The company occasionally goes off-panel for specialist advice, or as a result of conflicts.
The previous panel line-up also included Clifford Chance, Dentons, TLT, Osborne Clarke, Veale Wasbrough Vizards, Kennedys, Weightmans and Foot Anstey, all of which have come off.
On the panel process itself, Santi said that innovation was a crucial part of the assessment. "We included specific sections in our requests for proposal asking for information on technologies and processes that could be used to support us. We have been very clear with our panel firms that we would like to cooperate in the work they are doing to improve their own processes."
EDF said that CMS and BCLP's shared focus on innovation and technology had contributed to them winning spots on the panel.
EDF also asked firms to demonstrate the efforts they are making to improve diversity and inclusion, and requested evidence that they have plans in place to make their workforce – at all levels of seniority – "more reflective of the UK population".
In recent years, HSF has taken a lead role for EDF on the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant project, fielding a team of more than 30 lawyers, and last year the firm's head of power and renewables Julia Pyke moved over to become EDF's GC for nuclear new build businesses.
Santi and Pyke work alongside legal affairs director and company secretary Joe Souto and Claire Gooding, legal affairs director for generation and corporate. Principal solicitor Ashley Hofman and solicitor Kate Chow also played a key role in the panel review process.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 2NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 3Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 4Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 5Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250