Magic circle firms among array of advisers accused of 'squeezing income' from Carillion
Carillion inquiry report says firms were used as 'badge of credibility' as company unravelled
May 16, 2018 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
The parliamentary inquiry into the collapse of Carillion has accused law firms including Slaughter and May, Clifford Chance (CC) and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer of "squeezing fee income" from the company as it collapsed amid "recklessness, hubris and greed".
The final report into the construction company's high-profile demise – produced by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Work and Pensions select committees – describes Carillion's business model as an "unsustainable dash to cash", adding that the "mystery is not that it collapsed, but how it kept going for so long".
The report, released today (16 May) details how Carillion's directors were supported by an "array of illustrious advisory firms" which, as it unravelled, were "squeezing fee income out of what remained of the company".
It goes on to allege that the advisers were used as a "badge of credibility" that only served to prove the willingness of the company's board to "throw money at a problem" and of the firms to "accept generous fees".
Slaughters, CC and Freshfields are listed in the report alongside Mills & Reeve, Sacker & Partners, Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld as having received fees from Carillion in the days before it was declared insolvent. Almost £2m was paid to those law firms on 12 January, with Slaughters receiving the lion's share with £1.2m, followed by Akin Gump (£305,500) and Willkie Farr (£164,000).
The report argues that such advisory firms are "not incentivised to act as a check on recklessly-run businesses", and that "a long and lucrative relationship is not secured by rocking the boat".
Former Carillion chairman Philip Green – who told the inquiry that the board believed they took "high-quality advice" – is described as "delusional" in his upbeat assessment of the company's situation as it was in decline, while CFO Richard Adam is dubbed the "architect of Carillion's aggressive accounting policies". Company secretary and director of legal services Richard Tapp is not referenced in the report.
The report is also critical of the role played by big four accountancy firms KPMG, EY and PwC. KPMG is described as "complicit" in the company's accounting, due to its 19 year-role as auditor to the company, for which it was paid £29m. EY was paid £10.8m for "six months of failed turnaround advice", while Deloitte is said to have earned £10m for its position as internal auditor, charging an average of £775,000 a year since 2010.
The report warns of a "crisis of confidence" within the auditing profession, adding that the failures around Carillion are symptomatic of a market that "works for the Big Four firms but fails the wider economy".
"Waiting for a more competitive market that promotes quality and trust in audits has failed," the report states. "It is time for a radically different approach. The Government refers the statutory audit market to the Competition and Markets Authority. The terms of reference of that review should explicitly include consideration of both breaking up the Big Four into more audit firms, and detaching audit arms from those providing other professional services."
A host of law firms took up roles relating to Carillion's collapse, with Freshfields and Dentons advising the official receiver and Slaughters advising the company itself. CC and Linklaters advised a number of Carillion's lenders, while Mayer Brown acted for the Pension Protection Fund and Akin Gump and Willkie Farr took roles for private placement holders and convertible bond holders respectively.
Freshfields declined to comment. Slaughters and CC were contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250