Freshfields matches Cravath pay scale for US associates as Quinn hikes London salaries
Quinn boosts City pay bands by up to 19% while opting against move to match US rates
June 18, 2018 at 08:29 AM
3 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is raising its salaries for US associates to match the rates set by Cravath Swaine & Moore.
The magic circle firm's US associates will now be paid starting salaries of $190,000 (£143,000), rising to $350,000 (£266,000) for the class of 2009 and above.
It will also hand out summer bonuses of up to $25,000 (£19,000), following the same move by magic circle rival Clifford Chance last week.
Milbank set a new standard for associate pay at the start of the month, although just one week later it was bettered by Cravath, which matched its salaries for its junior associates while also going beyond Milbank's rates for mid-level and senior associates by $5,000-$10,000.
Linklaters and Allen & Overy are yet to confirm whether they will match Milbank or Cravath's rates.
CC is one among a bevy of top-tier firms to have equalled Cravath's standard in the US, alongside Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Kirkland & Ellis, Ropes & Gray, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Sullivan & Cromwell.
Matching Milbank, the new associate pay scale for Freshfields' US associates will be:
- 1st year – $190,000 (£143,000)
- 2nd year – $200,000 (£151,000)
- 3rd year – $220,000 (£166,000)
- 4th year – $255,000 (£194,000)
- 5th year – $280,000 (£213,000)
- 6th year – $305,000 (£232,000)
- 7th year – $325,000 (£247,000)
- 8th year – $340,000 (£258,000)
Meanwhile, Quinn Emanuel, which last week matched Cravath's rates for its US associates, has set out new salary bands for lawyers in its London office.
While the firm's City lawyers will be paid slightly below New York rates, all bands are being raised by 6%-19%, with the class of 2013 receiving the steepest percentage increase – up £30,000 from £155,000 to £185,000.
- Class of 2017 – £125,000 (up from £115,000)
- Class of 2016 – £133,000 (up from £125,000)
- Class of 2015 – £145,000 (up from £135,000)
- Class of 2014 – £170,000 (up from £145,000)
- Class of 2013 – £185,000 (up from £155,000)
- Class of 2012 – £200,000 (up from £170,000)
- Class of 2011 – £215,000 (up from £185,000)
- Class of 2010 – £225,000-£245,000 (up from £195,000-£215,000)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 2OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
- 3Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 4Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 5Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250