Former DLA Piper associate struck off by SDT after fabricating qualifications
Former Weightmans trainee struck off the roll after falsifying degree grades and experience
June 26, 2018 at 08:22 AM
3 minute read
A former DLA Piper associate has been struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) and asked to pay £6,000 in costs after admitting to fabricating her qualifications.
Tania Bains joined DLA in September 2015 as an associate in the finance and projects team, after completing a two-year training contract with Liverpool-headquartered Weightmans. She had previously taken a summer vacation placement with the regional firm.
Weightmans found a number of inconsistencies on her CV after she left for DLA, prompting an internal investigation that resulted in the firm reporting its concerns to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). DLA then suspended Bains and also reported her to the SRA, with Bains resigning from the firm before DLA's internal disciplinary proceedings concluded.
During the course of SDT hearings held in January and May this year, Weightmans corporate partner Gary Jones gave evidence, in which he alleged that Bains' CV was "largely a 'cut and paste of other people's experience'". He added that her claimed banking experience was "wholly inaccurate".
Bains was found to have falsified both subjects studied during her degree at the University of Wales and the grades she achieved during both her application for the Weightmans' training contract and for the role at DLA. Examples of subjects Bains falsely claimed to have studied include competition law and company law.
In her defence, Bains claimed that she had submitted her application for a Weightmans' training contract in the "mid-afternoon" on the final day applications were being accepted. She said that "there was nobody at home to check her records for her", meaning that she guessed her results for individual university modules. She maintained that she had "never knowingly [...] acted dishonestly".
In relation to her application to DLA, Bains admitted that there was a level of "stretching on a CV to make it sound bumped up or impressive", adding that her CV "read better than the competition" because she had used a partner's CV as a template. However, she admitted there were aspects of her CV included "at a stretch".
The tribunal found that her conduct has been "deliberate, calculated and repeated", adding that she had concealed her behaviour from both Weightmans and DLA, breaching her obligation to "protect the public and the reputation of the legal profession".
It also noted that despite her inexperience, she had been working at Weightmans for two years when she submitted her application to DLA, meaning she had an "understanding of the legal environment".
The tribunal decided that a suspension would not be appropriate as it was not confident that the misconduct would not be repeated.
A DLA Piper spokesperson said: "Ms Bains left our firm in February 2016, a few months after she joined, following an internal investigation into this matter. Whilst regrettable for the individual concerned, we fully respect the decision of the SDT."
A Weightmans spokesperson added: "Tania Bains worked for Weightmans between 2013 and 2015. In line with our values of diligence and integrity, and in compliance with our regulatory obligations, we disclosed concerns regarding Ms Bains to the SRA. The hearing and outcome remain a matter for the SRA to comment further."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
DLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
McCarthy Tétrault Welcomes Former CPP Investments Leader to Its Business Law Group
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250