Bird & Bird boosts PEP by almost 10% on the back of international expansion
Firm posts positive financials after San Francisco launch and Chinese co-operation agreement
June 28, 2018 at 08:36 AM
2 minute read
Bird & Bird has posted a 6% increase in revenue, alongside a 9.5% rise in profit per equity partner (PEP) for 2017-18.
The firm, which reports its financial results in euros, saw revenues rise by 5.9% from €361m to €382.3m. However, the firm added that on a sterling basis, revenue was up 11.1% from £303.2m to £337m.
The turnover rise came alongside a 9.5% increase in PEP to €624,000 (£550,000), while net debt fell during the year from €49m (£43m) to less than €26m (£22m) as at 30 April 2018.
Commenting on the results, CEO David Kerr (pictured) told Legal Week: "We have seen strong growth in areas such as technology acquisitions – a lot of M&A is being driven by acquisitions that provide access to technology. Data is also proving to be very important and was very busy in the last year, as well as more concern among clients regarding complex regulation.
"Geographically, we have seen high growth in the Asia-Pacific region, but we have also had good growth in nearly all of our markets."
As part of the firm's Asia-Pacific expansion, it last year secured a cooperation agreement with Chinese firm AllBright enabling both firms to work together on joint business development mandates. The deal also saw the Chinese firm open a new City base located at Bird & Bird's premises at 12 New Fetter Lane.
Kerr said the relationship has developed "quicker than expected" since the agreement was finalised. He added: "Like everything in China, things move faster than elsewhere in the world. The strategy for us was to target work coming out from Chinese companies and we have seen a wide range of different types of work emerging."
In October last year, the firm also launched a base in San Francisco focused on technology clients. The new base does not offer US legal advice, but instead works with the firm's 'best friend' US firms. Kerr said the office was part of the firm's strategy to be "the number one firm advising companies being transformed by technology".
Bird & Bird also bolstered its corporate finance offering during the year, with the addition of a 20-strong team in Budapest following Weil Gotshal & Manges shuttering its Budapest office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Malaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 2Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 3DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 4'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 5'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
