CC targets 'different mindset and different way of working' with new innovation divisions
Magic circle firm identifies opportunity to 'monetise experience in tech solutions'
July 17, 2018 at 04:12 AM
3 minute read
Law firms looking to keep pace with client demands for innovation often find themselves at odds with their own infrastructure. It's something that Bas Boris Visser, global head of innovation and business change at Clifford Chance (CC), has faced again and again in trying to produce innovation at the firm.
"We find that the people who want to be involved in these kind of things need a certain level of freedom and space to operate," Visser explained. "They need to be able to experiment, and lawyers simply don't like to experiment because it may go wrong, and we don't like to make mistakes."
CC's recent launch of two new 'innovation units' – Clifford Chance Applied Solutions and Clifford Chance Create – is an attempt for the firm to eke out the necessary space for experimentation. The Create unit will be charged with helping the firm flesh out its technology ecosystem and partner network, while Applied Solutions is dedicated to helping build and scale out technology systems for clients.
Visser explained that the firm decided to move forward in creating these innovation units after deploying a MiFID II compliance tool co-constructed with Neota Logic, where they saw the potential to scale and monetise the venture.
"We see a fantastic opportunity to monetise experience in tech solutions. We have to make sure we're acting on those lessons learned," Visser said of the experience.
To do that, the firm opted to create these two divisions, each headed by Visser, to operate slightly outside of the firm's traditional leadership structure.
"If you really want to do this successfully, you need to have in your ecosystem people who are really focused on customer satisfaction and product development; all the skills that you would typically expect in a software-based or subscription-based environment, but which are not necessarily present in our normal law firm ecosystem. It's really a different mindset and a different way of working," Visser explained.
In the endless debate as to whether firms should seek to bring in or look outside for technology developers, Visser said CC looks more to the latter. "Our philosophy is that we're really good at the legal stuff; we hope to bring the best legal expertise to this venture, but we also know that there are others that are much better at the technology part," he said. The firm is actively engaged in building relationships with technology companies like Kira Systems and others.
Unlike a software company, however, Visser sees the firm's role as more concerned with implementation than strictly engineering. "We realised it's not just about building a great tool and selling as many licences as possible, but [clients] were really interested and encouraging us to help them to make sure that the over 2,000 licence holders would actually go to the platform and use the tool," he said.
Visser hopes these two new innovation units might be able to inform the core business of the firm. "We're learning a lot of lessons on how we can get our own core business better," he added.
- Innovation in law will be top of the agenda at this year's LegalWeek Connect conference, which will take place on 28-29 November at County Hall, London. Click here for more information
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250