No-deal Brexit could see UK legal sector shed 12,000 jobs and lose £3bn in turnover
New Law Society study sets out 'significant negative effects' of no-deal scenario
August 22, 2018 at 09:03 AM
3 minute read
The UK legal sector could suffer a £3bn revenue hit and lose 12,000 jobs by 2025 in the event of a 'no-deal' Brexit, according to a new study released by the Law Society.
The study warns against the potentially "significant negative effects" on the legal sector of a hard Brexit, an outcome that is expected to hit turnover growth and economic performance across all sectors, resulting in reduced demand for legal services and a decrease in employment in the legal sector.
In its analysis of both 'soft' and 'hard' Brexit outcomes, the Law Society anticipates a near £3bn loss in turnover to the legal sector by 2025 in the event of a no-deal. The study suggests that, if in such a situation the UK were to fall back on World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, growth in the sector could drop to as low as 1.1% per year – or £30.86bn turnover by 2025 – as opposed to steady growth of 2.1% in a 'soft' Brexit scenario – or £33.83bn turnover.
Both figures contrast starkly with the 4.6% average annual growth the legal sector saw before the 2008 financial crisis.
Though the findings suggest a buoyant market until 2020 – due in large part to an increase in work flowing from post-Brexit regulatory changes – a no-deal scenario is likely to have a serious long-term impact on the legal sector.
A no-deal Brexit, the Law Society forecasts, would result in 12,000 job losses from the sector in 10 years. The study does, however, suggest this will owe not just to Brexit, but also to the increasing adoption of new technology, which during a 20-year period could see the legal workforce shrink by as much as 20%.
The study also suggests that UK legal services exports are unlikely to benefit in the medium term from the weaker pound which, although in recent years has resulted in an uptick in net exports, has already produced benefits that are unlikely to reappear in the longer term.
Highlighting in particular the impact on the City, Slaughter and May partner Jeff Twentyman said: "At best, Brexit will continue to cause disruption and uncertainty for the foreseeable future. Whatever happens in the short term, in the longer term, say over five years and further, London will not always be the easiest and most obvious choice it once was."
City firms have in recent years hedged against the no-deal scenario by registering their lawyers in Belfast, with 1,644 England and Wales solicitors registering since 2016.
Law Society president Christina Blacklaws commented: "Brexit is likely to have a significant negative effect on the legal sector in the medium and longer term. This is largely due to the knock-on impact of Brexit on the wider economy as demand for legal services relies on the success of other sectors of the UK economy.
"A hard Brexit could have a significant impact on employment in the sector, with lower growth and less investment in UK firms leading to lower productivity growth in the sector."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGerman Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Hengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250