Conditions of ex-SFO chief's move to Slaughter and May revealed
Letter from vetting committee also reveals Slaughters outbid three firms to secure role on multimillion-pound Tchenguiz brothers litigation
September 12, 2018 at 12:31 PM
3 minute read
Details of ex-Serious Fraud Office (SFO) director David Green QC's move to Slaughter and May have been revealed in a government letter that sets out the conditions of his new job, as well revealing details of the magic circle firm's role on the multimillion-pound Tchenguiz brothers lawsuit brought against the SFO in 2013.
The letter was published today (12 September) by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACoBA), which vets new roles taken up by former ministers, senior civil servants and other Crown servants, to avoid conflicts of interest.
Acknowledging that Green, as head of the SFO was "responsible for decisions which benefited Slaughters", the letter states that the committee recognised there could be concerns over a "high-profile public office holder moving from a pivotal role within the criminal justice system to a private law firm operating in the same area".
As such, the ACoBA has imposed a number of conditions on his move. These include that Green: should not advise on any matters relating to investigations conducted by the SFO during his tenure as director; he should not draw on any privileged information available to him from his time at the SFO; that he should not directly engage with the body on behalf of Slaughters or its clients; or be personally involved in lobbying government or the SFO for two years from his last day at the department.
The letter also contains details of Green's official dealings with Slaughters during his tenure at the SFO – in particular the multimillion-pound claims resulting from its failed investigation into entrepreneur brothers Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz.
The letter states that Slaughters was paid fees of "circa £15m" for representing the SFO in the legal battle, which saw the body sued for damages by the brothers in January 2013. The case, in which the SFO admitted errors in the evidence it used to obtain search warrants against the pair, was settled for £4.5m in 2014.
The letter reveals that four City firms were approached to advise the SFO on the lawsuit, but Slaughters was selected as it had no conflicts to prevent it from acting and "offered a lower rate". It adds that Green played no role in selecting Slaughters.
Other SFO cases referred to in the letter include the investigation into Rolls-Royce, which concluded with a groundbreaking £497.25m deferred prosecution agreement last year.
Green said he attended one meeting with Slaughters and the CEO and chair of Rolls-Royce to "reset" negotiations during the case, and that he had no other dealings with Slaughters with regards to other clients of the firm under investigation by the SFO.
Slaughters was also required by the ACoBA to provide evidence of how it would deal with any potential conflicts presented by Green's hire, stating that matters relating to the SFO would be put behind an "information barrier", meaning that he would be unable to access information on the cases from the moment he joins the firm.
Green's move to Slaughters was confirmed yesterday (11 September), ending months of speculation. He will join the magic circle firm as senior consultant on 22 October, six months after he left the SFO in April.
The letter states that Green was approached about joining Slaughters by the firm's global investigations group co-heads, Richard Swallow and Jonathan Cotton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250