CMS makes legal services and tech push with dedicated innovation team launch
New group to help join up the legal services and tech offerings of legacy firms.
September 14, 2018 at 08:56 AM
2 minute read
CMS has launched a new team responsible for joining up and advancing the firm's legal services and technology offerings, in a drive to consolidate the ambitions of the three legacy firms that merged last year.
The team, called CMS by design, is led by CMS executive partner Paul Stevens, and also consists of the firm's head of legal service design and delivery John Craske, head of tech innovation Jane Challoner, IT head Razvan Cretu, head of digital and data Elle Todd and client management head Jo Witham. They will report on progress to both senior partner Penelope Warne and managing partner Stephen Millar.
The group will help shape delivery of CMS's legal services and technology, as well as its four client services. These include Instinctive Understanding, its initiative for in-house lawyers; digital upskilling service Digital Academy; legal tech hub Developers on Demand; and Mix, which provides bespoke tech services to clients.
"Part of the rationale behind the merger was to invest time, energy and resource to develop better ways of serving clients through tech, processes and new approaches," said CMS executive partner, Paul Stevens, who was one of the architects behind the merger. "It's holistic, and aimed to embrace all elements of the client's needs."
The team will sit inside the firm's wider global tech and innovation group and work alongside an advisory team made up of lawyers from CMS's key sector groups, as well as business service specialists, external advisers and clients.
Stevens highlighted some of the projects that the legacy firms had embarked on, including Olswang's startup incubator equIP, and CMS Cameron McKenna's agile systems of working and use of Surface Pros.
"Since the merger, we've managed to leverage more resource into these initatives, and have grown equIP into a 65-business-strong programme," Stevens added. "It's doing well and we're rolling it out internationally.
"The three [legacy] firms had new technologies, which together could deliver more bang for your buck," he added. "On the merger, the idea was to be a future-facing firm. Now having gone through it, there will always be hiccups, but there were an awful lot of good things – this is the fruition of that."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$14B Nippon US Steel Deal to be Blocked But Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Milbank’s Capital Markets Partner Leaves for China’s Han Kun in Hong Kong
EY Law Launches in Portugal, Targets 40 Lawyers by End of 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 2Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
- 3$2M Settlement for Woman Struck by New Jersey Transit Bus
- 4BREAKING: Donald Trump to Face Sentencing on January 10, Judge Rules
- 5Samuel M. Lehrer, Retired Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge, Dies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250