'New law' legal services provider UnitedLex sells majority stake to private equity giant
CVC deal gives UnitedLex access to $500m for investment in tech and acquisitions
September 21, 2018 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Private equity giant CVC Capital Partners has acquired a majority stake in US legal services provider UnitedLex.
Daniel Reed, the CEO of UnitedLex – which during the past 18 months has signed contracts worth $1.5bn – said the transaction will give his company access to $500m in debt and equity that he will use to invest in technology, target businesses for acquisition and invest alongside the clients it serves.
"It's enough capital to allow us to really do some transformative things," Reed said. "It puts us in a situation where we don't have any constraints anymore. It allows us to think as big and as aggressive as anyone can."
The two firms said in a joint press release that CVC's investment "was one of the largest transactions to date with any legal services provider". CVC, which has more than $110bn in committed funds, is one of Europe's largest private equity firms.
The announcement said UnitedLex's leadership team had "fully reinvested in the transaction", which Reed said was indicative of their belief that they can create "the largest legal services company in the world".
"That's what we're committed to do," said Reed, a former senior associate at Greenberg Traurig. "It's just a lot of self-confidence, and probably borderline idealism, in terms of what we believe we can do."
UnitedLex, founded in 2006, had been backed by a private equity arm of JPMorgan Chase & Co. The company's clients include more than 25% of the global Fortune 500, scattered across 18 countries, according to the press release announcing the deal.
"UnitedLex has a multibillion-dollar opportunity ahead of it, with legal services being one the few remaining verticals that is early in the penetration curve of technology, consulting and solution delivery," said a statement from Siddharth Patel, a Singapore-based CVC senior managing director for telecoms, media and technology. "UnitedLex continues to innovate with game-changing engagements with the world's leading companies. Now is the perfect time for us to provide significant capital to enhance its growth and scale, the beginnings of which we've already seen in its impressive financial performance, customer wins and pipeline of opportunities."
The deal marks the third major investment this month in the legal services space. Kira Systems raised $50m in its first round of fundraising, and Silicon Valley startup Atrium Legal Technology Services Inc received $65m in funding from several big-name investors.
UnitedLex has made legal business headlines within the past year, securing long-term deals to outsource major portions of Fortune 500 legal departments. The so-called 'new law' company announced a five-year deal last December with DXC Technology to provide a team of about 250 lawyers for its corporate legal department.
And this past March, UnitedLex struck another deal to outsource portions of General Electric's in-house legal department including document review, electronic discovery, litigation and operations. In June, UnitedLex and LeClairRyan unveiled a new venture called ULX Partners that seeks to outsource non-legal operations.
Legal industry observers have anticipated the sale of other new law companies. Axiom, for instance, has toyed with the idea of going public. Private equity companies hold their investment in companies, on average, for about six years, according to data from PitchBook.
UnitedLex's investors had held the company much longer – as have investors of Axiom – which had been the source of speculation that both companies would be involved in a transaction.
Reed said CVC had approached UnitedLex as far back as 18 months ago, as the buyout firm was looking into making investments in the legal market. He said CVC was interested in companies that had 'democratised' the way consumers access products, such as the way Uber had made cab rides more readily available.
"And they looked at our platform and thought what we're doing is enabling companies to get legal support in ways they haven't historically been able to," Reed said. "And you're allowing professionals to access a new kind of training and expand their careers in ways they weren't able to do either. It's an interesting way of approaching the market."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
Trending Stories
- 1Wholesale Real Estate Transaction Transparency and Protection Act Takes Effect Jan. 4: What You Need to Know
- 2Decision of the Day: 'Attorney's Eyes Only' Protective Order Denied; Good Cause Not Demonstrated
- 3The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?
- 4Lawsuits, AI Accuracy and Debt: Legal Tech Companies that Ran Into Trouble in 2024
- 5Preemptive Litigation: A Potential Approach for a Precise Situation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250