Hogan Lovells suspends partner for watching adult video at work
Firm begins investigation and reviews policy on access to adult content
November 09, 2018 at 05:07 AM
2 minute read
Hogan Lovells has suspended a partner in its London office for watching an adult video at work, with the firm reviewing its internet access policy as a result.
The partner was overseen by a lawyer in Irwin Mitchell's London office, which is next door to Hogan Lovells' Atlantic House base on Holborn Viaduct.
The Irwin Mitchell lawyer filmed the partner's behaviour on their mobile phone, according to RollonFriday, and reported the incident to Hogan Lovells' HR team.
The partner in question has now been suspended and the firm has begun an internal investigation into the episode.
A Hogan Lovells spokesperson said: "We were made aware of an individual in our office misusing their computer to watch adult material. Such behaviour is unacceptable and we have suspended them pending a full internal investigation."
As a result of the incident, Hogan Lovells has also "reviewed and tightened" its policy on which websites can be accessed at work.
The spokesperson said: "We didn't block access to websites unless they represented a cybersecurity risk (eg they have malware on them). The nature of our work for clients sometimes means we need to carry out investigations in areas which require us to have flexible access. We have reviewed and tightened this policy."
The conduct of partners has come under increased scrutiny in recent years as firms look to move away from male-dominated cultures of years gone by. However, instances of partners at major firms being suspended for internet misuse are rare.
One legal recruiter told Legal Week: "In today's climate where partner behaviour is under a close microscope, this type of thing cannot be tolerated. We would expect Hogan Lovells to view this quite harshly."
Related:
- Firms urged to do more to end male domination of corporate networking as female partners call out 'sleazy' events
- Male partners question 'hypocritical backlash' over men-only events as women set out grim reality of City networking
- Top UK law firms rethink stance on relationships at work post #MeToo scrutiny
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
- 2GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
- 3As Political Extremism Rises, Is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 4So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 5US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250