'All firms have gardening leave – but this is different': the Linklaters plan to restrict team exits
Magic circle firm aims to stem flow of departures as US rivals continue to target top talent
November 14, 2018 at 09:10 AM
4 minute read
Linklaters brought in new measures to prevent teams of partners leaving the firm last year, it has emerged, as top UK firms continue to grapple with the threat posed by acquisitive US rivals.
The new provisions, which were voted in at the firm's annual partnership conference in 2017, mean that Linklaters can restrict departing partners from joining a particular firm for 12 months, if the firm in question has recruited five or more of their Linklaters colleagues in the preceding year.
Multiple sources have told Legal Week that the move was motivated in part by a series of significant departures to US firms in recent years, including a run of partners who left to join Kirkland & Ellis.
Seven partners left for Kirkland in 2015 and 2016, including four in private equity (see full list below), while other departures to US firms in recent years have included Germany private equity head Rainer Traugott, Duesseldorf M&A partner Nikolaos Paschos and London financial regulation partner Carl Fernandes, all of who are now at Latham & Watkins.
The restrictions apply to lawyers who have been part of the same team in the 24 months prior to their exit, including those who may be in different offices but have worked closely together. The 12-month restriction on moving is double the length of the magic circle firm's standard six months' gardening leave.
It is understood that to date, the restriction has not been enforced, and one ex-partner told Legal Week that the only firm it would currently apply to is Kirkland.
Restrictions aimed at preventing team moves are understood to be rare at top City firms, although one recruiter told Legal Week that such measures are not unheard of.
One source close to the firm told Legal Week: "All firms have gardening leave provisions; it creates a hiatus between the departure and the new arrival, and it's more understandable – but this is different."
Other non-compete provisions were already in place at Linklaters, which mean partners cannot immediately continue working with existing clients after joining their new firm. Specifically, departing partners are prohibited from working with Linklaters clients for up to one year after leaving, if the partner has worked with said client in the preceding 24 months.
Both restrictions can be waived by Linklaters' management at the request of the departing lawyer, and it is understood that some allowances have been made since their introduction.
Another source said: "You'd expect it's not popular with clients. You shouldn't be out there restricting clients on who they can work with, and lawyers should be able to compete on merit."
Linklaters also shook up its lockstep last year, with London partners now taking a minimum of 12 years to reach the top of the lockstep, compared to 10 years under the previous system. New London partners join the lockstep at 14 points and progress by three points each year, to reach the top of the 50-point equity after 12 years.
Other measures brought in by Linklaters during the 2017 conference, which was held in Monaco, included a move away from individual financial targets for partners. Performance is now assessed by considering a broader range of factors encompassing business development, marketing and innovation, rather than a sole focus on individual billings.
Linklaters declined to comment.
Linklaters partner departures to Kirkland & Ellis, 2015-16
- Private equity partner and head of real estate M&A Matthew Elliott – February 2015
- Competition and antitrust head Paula Riedel – May 2015
- Hong Kong finance partner David Irvine – September 2015
- Head of Nordic private equity Roger Johnson – September 2015
- Private equity partner David Holdsworth and tax partner Tim Lowe – May 2016
- Private equity partner Stuart Boyd – May 2016
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute readA&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers, Including Madrid Practice Head, to EY
3 minute readRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250