KPMG sets sights on doubling size of legal services arm
Big Four firm aiming for more than 3,000 lawyers in legal services offering
November 22, 2018 at 09:58 AM
4 minute read
KPMG is aiming to almost double headcount in its global legal services arm to more than 3,000 lawyers in the next few years, as the Big Four firm also plots ambitious growth in the UK.
The accounting giant's legal team currently comprises 1,800 lawyers across offices in 75 countries, and UK legal services head Nick Roome told Legal Week that as well as exploring new jurisdictions, including in the Far East, the firm is also aiming to expand its current 130-lawyer UK team, with a number of "senior" hires in the pipeline.
Roome has now led KPMG's legal business for two and a half years after joining from DLA Piper in July 2014, shortly before the Solicitors Regulation Authority awarded KPMG its alternative business structure (ABS) licence.
Since then, KPMG has scaled its ambitions and made a concerted push into the legal market, adding to its legal services practices in London and Manchester with a new base in Birmingham in 2015, and making hires from firms including Eversheds Sutherland and Shoosmiths.
During the past 18 months, the firm has doubled headcount in its partner and director group.
"The ABS licence levelled the playing field," said Roome. "We are now not constrained in how we want to build our legal services business, and can get on with growing our capabilities to meet the market opportunity."
He added: "From a client perspective, if you're operating under the same regulatory principles as a traditional law firm, it's helpful in terms of getting the market optics right around what you're doing. It gives clients that comfort that you're operating on the same regulatory basis as any other lawyer."
We are now not constrained in how we want to build our legal services business
While the Big Four push into legal services has worried some, Roome is keen to dispel any idea that traditional law firms have anything to fear, stressing that KPMG has significant relationships with some firms. The firm recently turned to magic circle firm Linklaters for advice on the Competition and Markets Authority's review of the audit sector.
However, increasing client demand for integrated services does give the Big Four a significant advantage over some law firms, as Roome acknowledges.
"We run an integrated practice," he said. "So it's not just a KPMG lawyer working with a client. It's a multidisciplinary team working with a client. That's fundamentally the difference between us and a law firm."
While claiming that KPMG is "not trying to build a law firm within an accounting firm", Roome believes that "insight [at traditional firms] is not going to be as broad".
He added: "We offer different types of insight and our lawyers have the opportunity to absorb things in the wider context of our business. It's not about a single capability. We've not been around for as long as traditional law firms, but our legal business is maturing year on year and the market is starting to see us as a more established player."
The legal services arm operates four core service lines: business structures and transactions; tax disputes and investigations; employment and immigration; and 'new law' and global, which handles filing and regulatory process work for clients.
Among the accounting elite, immigration in particular has lately come to the fore. This summer, Deloitte formed an alliance with US immigration law firm Berry Appleman & Leiden, and PwC subsequently followed suit, announcing its own tie-up with US firm Fragomen.
While KPMG has no current plans to form such an alliance of its own, Roome highlights the area's strategic importance to the firm and attributes the renewed immigration focus to an upsurge in demand among corporates for more certainty on worker rights and movement of people in view of Brexit, among other considerations.
In the recruitment context, Roome claims KPMG "doesn't tend to lose lawyers to traditional law firms", and suggests general counsel are becoming more inclined to look to the Big Four rather than traditional law firms for legal talent.
"Lawyers are interested in what we're building," he adds. "The breadth of skills, perspective and insight which lawyers operating at KPMG would develop, would likely make them more attractive for roles in industry."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250