Government Brexit department reveals legal spend amid questions over advice
Department for Exiting the EU discloses three-month legal spend as row over publication of Brexit legal advice continues
December 04, 2018 at 07:48 AM
3 minute read
The UK Government's Brexit department spent almost £1.2m on internal legal advice during the third quarter of its 2018-19 financial year, a new filing has revealed.
The Department for Exiting the European Union (DExEU) paid the Government Legal Department (GLD) a fixed fee of £1,191,250 for the period from October to December 2018. The department's financial year runs from 1 April to 30 March.
The disclosures come amid intense political wrangling over the government's legal position on the EU Withdrawal Agreement, a summary of which was published yesterday (3 December).
Senior MPs from six parties have written a joint letter to Commons Speaker John Bercow to ask him to launch proceedings of contempt against the government for failing to publish the "full and final legal advice on the Brexit deal" as ordered by parliament.
The GLD, a non-ministerial government department, operates outside of any political oversight. The £1.2m legal spend represents the largest sum paid by DExEU to an external organisation during the three-month period, ahead of the £720,000 paid to Boston Consulting Group.
The disclosures also reveal that DExEU paid nearly £40,000 to Interserve Facilities Management on estates and facilities costs during Q3, and more than £74,000 on "travel and subsistence" services from Clarity Travel Management.
The figures have been published as part of the DExEU's transparency data report, which details any spending in excess of £25,000.
A DExEU spokesperson said: "As we unpick more than 40 years of legal harmonisation with the European Union, it is essential to have the best legal advice.
"The government's internal legal services team has some of the finest lawyers in the country and of course we will make full use of them. But where appropriate, we will continue to draw on the advice and expertise of lawyers from the private sector."
Law firms providing legal support to the government during the Brexit negotiations have included Slaughter and May, which seconded City corporate partner Mark Horton to DExEU ahead of his retirement earlier this year.
Last year, DExEU spent £3.7m on legal costs during the last financial year, including more than £1.2m on Brexit-related litigation. Legal costs represented DExEU's second-most significant area of spending, behind staff costs of £14m for the year ending 31 March 2017.
Litigation costs represented almost a third of the department's total legal spend during the year, with the bulk of the £1.2m in litigation costs relating to the high-profile Article 50 legal challenge led by investment manager Gina Miller. The remainder of the litigation costs (£78,000) related to Article 127 litigation, which concerned Britain's membership of the European Economic Area.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250