Quinn Emanuel launches City patent litigation practice with Bird & Bird hire
US firm ends decade-long search for London patent litigator
January 11, 2019 at 03:30 AM
3 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has launched a patent litigation practice in London with the hire of a lawyer from Bird & Bird, ending a decade-long search.
The Los Angeles-headquartered firm has recruited Bird & Bird senior associate Alexandrine Ananou, who becomes the firm's first patent litigator in the City.
The firm has made no secret of its desire to add a patent litigation specialism to its core litigation practice since launching in London in 2008. However, it has struggled to secure the services of a litigator with the requisite experience, due to the lack of patent litigators at the City's elite firms and challenges presented by conflicts of interest, notably thwarting attempts by the firm to hire out of the magic circle.
The firm has a strong reputation in patent litigation globally, particularly in the US and Germany, and now with the hire of Ananou – who joins the firm this week – Quinn sidesteps the issues that have long hampered it from recruiting effectively in the City.
Partners moving from firm to firm are often subject to onerous restrictive covenants, preventing them from acting for earlier clients. This has meant Quinn has often been contract-barred from bringing in partners whose previous firms have acted in any capacity for clients on the other side of ongoing Quinn litigations.
Examples include Apple's protracted legal battles with Quinn clients Samsung and Qualcomm, for which the firm recently secured a landmark victory in Germany.
While associates in the US are subject to more stringent conflict checks, the UK's regulations around this are not quite as burdensome.
Quinn London managing partner Richard East said: "For a decade we've been trying to solve the patents conundrum in London, without success. But bringing in Alexandrine is, we hope, the first step in solving this."
The office now hopes to grow the patents team "from the bottom up", with a further associate hire expected in the coming months.
Quinn also wants to grow beyond litigation in the City, with ambitions to add on specialisms in competition law and white-collar crime, as well as expanding its arbitration offering, which could see it adding to its 18-strong City partnership.
With a focus on anti-bank litigation, and acting for both claimants and defendants in the ongoing EU-wide trucks litigation and for the claimant in the long-running Mastercard litigation, Quinn's City partners are typically expected to bill between 2,000 and 2,500 hours a year.
Last month, Quinn associates who billed between 2,100 and 2,399 hours in 2018 were paid bonuses starting at $15,000 (£12,000) for the 2017 class, up to $100,000 (£78,000) for the 2011 associates and above.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250