GCs want to spend less on lawyers and more on tech in 2019
Survey of more than 90 in-house teams identifies key priorities for year ahead
January 17, 2019 at 03:00 AM
4 minute read
More than one in two GCs are aiming to cut their legal spend this year, according to a survey of 90 in-house lawyers at companies including Monzo, TransferWise, Npower, Pearson and notonthehighstreet.com.
The survey, conducted by legal services provider Lexoo, asked GCs and legal counsel to identify their team's top three priorities for the coming year, with 53% saying that reducing legal spend was among their main aims for 2019.
Adopting new tech tools was number one priority, selected by 63% of respondents, with more efficient outsourcing of legal work coming in third at 49%.
Kate Burns, general counsel at online marketplace notonthehighstreet.com, was one of those who picked reducing external legal spend and adopting new tech tools as her top three priorities.
She told Legal Week: "We're a marketplace and our business model is often not well understood. The regulatory environment we operate in can be quite complicated. This means we are resource constrained and have to prioritise.
"For me, a lot of last year was really about getting our head around the tech tools and what's out there. For the size of our brand, we have a small legal team – just three of us – so we're always looking for anything we can do to improve efficiency and save money."
Notonthehighstreet currently uses Taylor Wessing for corporate matters, Keystone Law for intellectual property and data protection, and Osborne Clarke for "most other things".
Burns said she was particularly interested in adopting contract management systems and data-mapping solutions – "especially with Brexit coming up".
Forty percent of respondents said that expanding their in-house team was a priority for 2019, with 43% saying they wanted to help their company expand internationally.
For Jenifer Swallow, GC at financial services provider TransferWise, these two priorities are linked.
"TransferWise is a very fast-growth company. We enter into new markets all the time and evolve product features and sign with new partners often. As the company grows internationally, and in complexity and maturity, we have to ensure the legal team are able to keep pace. We're four lawyers and two non-lawyers at the moment; I'd like to expand that to six and three by the end of the year."
Daniel van Binsbergen, founder and CEO at Lexoo, commented: "With businesses facing increasing economic and political risk, there's a huge opportunity for legal to play a more visible role and demonstrate their value.
"In-house legals are under pressure to do more with less and they recognise that new technologies and efficiency tools have an important role to play."
The survey also asked in-house counsel what their top three personal goals were for 2019. More than three quarters said developing their personal brand was a top priority, while 69% said they were aiming to get more involved in their company's strategy.
The survey canvassed the opinion of 94 in-house teams in total. Of those who responded, about 75% were GCs or heads of legal.
The full results
What are your team's priorities for 2019?
- Adopt tech tools (eg contract management, legal spend tracker, etc) – 63%
- Reduce external legal spend – 53%
- Look at ways to outsource legal work more efficiently – 49%
- Help the business expand internationally – 43%
- Grow my in-house legal team – 40%
- Set up a legal operations function – 22%
- Appoint a new (or review the existing) legal panel – 18%
- Other – 12%
What are your personal goals for 2019?
- Develop my personal brand with internal and external stakeholders – 76%
- Be more involved in company strategic decision-making – 69%
- Skill up in legal tech and legal operations – 48%
- Become a better team leader – 46%
- Spend less time at the office – 27%
- Be appointed to the board – 13%
- Move into a commercial role (eg COO) – 11%
- Other – 10%
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250