Thirteen firms win places on insurance giant MS Amlin's debut panel
CMS and Norton Rose among new line up for combined company
January 18, 2019 at 09:15 AM
2 minute read
CMS, Norton Rose Fulbright and Simmons & Simmons have all won places on insurance giant MS Amlin's 13-strong legal panel.
It is the company's first legal panel following UK-based Amlin's acquisition by Japan's Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group in 2016.
Other firms to have been appointed to the line-up include HFW, DWF, DAC Beachcroft, RPC, Kennedys and Keoghs.
MS Amlin provides insurance cover to a range of companies, operating in the UK, continental European and Bermudian markets.
Longtime adviser Linklaters was, in 2004, appointed to legacy Amlin's seven-strong panel. The magic circle firm now sits outside the panel as a key strategic adviser to the company's board.
The UK and Japan company has about 2,000 employees and annual revenues of £2.5bn.
Back in 2004, advisers included the likes of Ince & Co, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert (now Clyde & Co), and Dechert, but none of those are on the current panel.
In 2015, Linklaters corporate head Aedamar Comiskey advised Amlin on its £3.5bn sale to Japanese company Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance that created MS Amlin. CMS and Norton Rose were among the firms on Amlin's panel before the combination.
Fox Williams, Campbell Johnston Clark and McKinty & Wright have also been appointed to the panel to handle day-to-day employment and property matters for the City-headquartered company. Fox Williams also won a place on legacy Amlin's inaugural panel.
Current line-up member Norton Rose collaborated with the insurance firm last September to launch an initiative in which a startup businesses pitched ideas to a panel, with the hope of winning £25,000 of legal advice.
MS Amlin panel 2019:
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang
Clyde & Co
DWF
Norton Rose Fulbright
Simmons & Simmons
DAC Beachcroft
HFW
RPC
Kennedys
Keoghs
Fox Williams
Campbell Johnston Clark
McKinty & Wright
Photo credit: Ingo Lehbrink
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells & 10 Top Stories That Shaped Africa in 2024
4 minute read
Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of Growing Threats From AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
3 minute read
Baker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
