Final BLP accounts show operating profit fell 21% in last year before US merger
BCLP posts first combined results since transatlantic tie-up as Addleshaws LLPs reveal value of HBJ merger
January 29, 2019 at 11:36 AM
3 minute read
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) has filed the final LLP accounts for Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP), revealing falling financials at the legacy UK firm prior to its transatlantic merger with Bryan Cave last year.
The accounts, which cover the 12 months to 30 April 2018, show operating profit at BLP fell by 21% from £72.5m to £56.9m during the year, while fee income fell 3% from £271.2m to £263.6m.
After the merger, which went live at the start of April 2018, the combined BCLP adopted a US-style remuneration model for partners, in a move away from the traditional UK lockstep.
BLP's highest-earning partner during 2017-18 made £1.4m, flat on the previous year's figure. The average number of legal staff increased 3% to 769, although overall headcount was down slightly as support staff numbers fell by 4%. Total staff costs rose 7% to £127.8m.
BCLP also today (29 January) announced its first combined financial results since the merger, touting a revenue figure of $905m for the 2018 calendar year, which the firm claims represents growth of 1% based on constant exchange rates. The firm also said partner profits had risen by 5%, but declined to provide a figure.
The transatlantic firm said that since the merger, collaboration efforts had resulted in "more than 600 cross-working and referral matters", which had generated revenues of about $20m.
In a joint statement, co-chairs Lisa Mayhew and Terry Pritchard said: "We are very pleased to see revenue growth and increased PEP in our first year. The firm has moved remarkably fast to integrate, with our lawyers forming increasingly strong connections to their clients and each other."
Meanwhile, Addleshaw Goddard has also filed its LLP accounts for 2017-18, shedding light on the value of its 17 June combination with Scotland's HBJ.
While no consideration was paid for the transaction, the accounts state that HBJ had total assets of £13.1m and total liabilities of £1.5m, equating to a total value of £11.6m.
Meanwhile, the firm's top of equity inched above the £1m for the first time since 2015-16, having slipped to £776,000 in 2016-17, which the firm at the time attributed to the impact of the Brexit referendum.
Owing in large part to the merger, profits also jumped from £64m to £83.5m, while the firm's total headcount increased by 167 to 1,369.
Addleshaws' merger with HBJ went live on 1 June 2017 and exceeded revenue expectations after the firm released its first post-merger financial results in July last year, adding more than £40m to the firm's top line.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250