Baker Botts new managing partner eyes further City growth and bigger global footprint
John W. Martin, the partner-in-charge of Baker Botts' Palo Alto office, will lead the firm from April 1.
February 14, 2019 at 09:48 AM
4 minute read
|
Baker Botts incoming managing partner, John W Martin, is looking to expand the Houston-based firm's presence in hot legal markets while continuing to deepen its roots in Texas.
Martin, who takes the helm on 1 April, said his initial priorities are adding lawyers on the US east and west coasts and in London, strengthening the 179-year-old firm's position in Texas and continuing its "outward focus" on clients in the technology and energy industries.
Partners in the 725-lawyer firm elected Martin on Wednesday to a four-year term as managing partner. He succeeds Andrew Baker, who was first elected in 2012 and faces mandatory retirement at the end of the year after 40 years with the firm.
Martin, who is in his 35th year at Baker Botts, is currently partner-in-charge of the firm's Palo Alto office. He is also the firmwide partner-in-charge of recruiting and a member of the firm's executive committee.
Baker said a group of senior partners unanimously recommended Martin as managing partner, selecting him out of four partners who sought to take on the leadership role. The others, according to the firm, were Richard Husseini, a partner in Houston who is chair of the tax department; Robert Scheinfeld, an intellectual property partner in New York; and Danny David, a litigation partner in Houston. None of the other candidates immediately returned telephone messages.
Baker said he's known Martin for more than 30 years, and his successor has the experience and attributes to lead the firm and meet market challenges.
"Having worked closely with John for most of my career, there's no one better," Baker said, noting that they worked together as young lawyers on the same client teams in the 1980s, and both helped Baker Botts open its Dallas office in 1985.
Baker said Martin has proven to be a great leader because of his success in growing the firm's Palo Alto office since 2013, and as head of recruiting. He said support for Martin as managing partner was broad-based throughout the firm.
"John's leadership is broadly embraced in every office, every practice group, among lawyers and other professionals," Baker said.
Martin, who intends to continue living in California, said it's important that Baker Botts continues to differentiate itself as a firm focused on technology and energy clients. Despite its Texas roots, he said, the firm counts 15 of its 25 largest clients in the tech sector.
"That doesn't indicate anything in terms of decline at all in the energy sector, but it's reflective of increasing strength in the tech sector," he said.
Martin said the firm has succeeded in growing on both coasts and in London, and he will continue to look at adding lawyers in London, New York and Washington DC, as well as in the Bay Area. Baker Botts opened a San Francisco office in 2016, adding to its Palo Alto location, which opened in 2008.
"Since January 2018, we've added 24 new lateral partners – 90% outside of Texas," Martin said.
However, he said, the firm will also aim to strengthen its "industry-leading" position in Texas, because it's the "core of the franchise".
As for new locations, Martin said Baker Botts is engaged in "preliminary discussions" in certain markets, but any addition to the firm's network of 14 offices must be client-driven.
Martin said his role as partner-in-charge of recruiting has been great preparation for the managing partner job, because it's given him great "visibility" into all parts of the firm. "The thing I've learned the most is the need to focus on our strengths and articulating our strategy," he said.
Martin's practice is focused on M&A, corporate governance, capital markets and complex technology transactions. He said his clients over the years have included Accenture, AT&T, CA Technologies, BearingPoint, Sallie Mae, Perot Systems and Dell.
|Further Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 2NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 3Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 4Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 5Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250