As chosen by GCs: the best law firms for diversity
Some firms stand out for their diversity and inclusion efforts, according to interviews with legal directors
February 18, 2019 at 02:05 AM
7 minute read
It is common for law firms to trumpet their diversity policies. Ask any what steps they have taken and you can expect to be deluged with marketing spiel. What is less common, however, is to hear what clients think.
Legal Week interviewed a dozen UK general counsel from major companies, including four FTSE 100 institutions, to name the law firms that have impressed them on their diversity and inclusion initiatives.
It follows the recent call to arms by US and UK GCs calling for law firms to show better progress on diversity or risk losing work.
Some of the in-house counsel refrained from nominating any firm, largely unimpressed by any of the efforts made. But most were able to point to at least a few firms they felt had made good progress.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Freshfields received the most nominations, with four naming the firm. One GC said the firm's gender diversity strategies had made "extraordinary leaps and bounds", while another said they were impressed by the firm's EDGE [Everyday Gender Equality] initiative. Set up last year, the initiative focuses on 10 everyday actions and how to approach them in the best way for gender equality in a workplace.
One GC added Freshfields was "taking it very seriously", noting their use of the mindful business charter – a set of principles for businesses to ensure they are being mindful of people's wellbeing.
Other initiatives at Freshfields include a women's network, inclusive behaviour training that is currently rolled out to 220 leaders, and the Stephen Lawrence initiative which helps Caribbean men from underprivileged backgrounds get onto a legal career path.
The firm makes it a necessity that 30% of partner promotion candidates are women.
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
BCLP received the second highest number of nominations. One GC pointed out the firm's work experience, school outreach, sponsorship and mentoring programmes, which they described as "genuinely collaborative". Another GC said its leadership takes gender and diversity "very seriously", adding that they are "actively engaging the GC community on this topic".
In May 2018, the firm met its target of having a 30% female UK-wide partnership; and in the firm's 2019 partner promotion round, 57% of the newly promoted partners were female and more than one fifth were BAME. Other standout points for the firm include the Mansfield Rule – which requires that female lawyers, lawyers of colour, and LGBTQ candidates represent at least 30% of the candidate pool for significant firm leadership roles.
CMS
CMS "walks the walk" on diversity and inclusion, according to one in-house leader. With a couple of nominations, the firm has impressed GCs on legal panels, with one GC saying the female lawyers were noticeably involved in the cases and the meetings.
Initiatives include using progressive work allocation systems that use technology to eradicate bias in work distribution, a mentoring scheme, flexible and agile working policies, mandatory diversity and inclusion training, face-to-face unconscious bias training, mental wellbeing and resilience training for managers, and a market-leading maternity and shared parental leave programme.
CMS also has a 'time out, no questions asked' policy, which allows all staff the opportunity to take one month of unpaid leave, per year, no questions asked.
Eversheds Sutherland
"I was very impressed with how the whole team was gelling together – you could tell they were an inclusive team," said one GC about Eversheds. The GC added: "It's not just about having figures you can point to on BAME etc, it's about how the teams are collaborating."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Are More Canadian Lawyers Bailing on Big Law to Found Their Own Firms?
4 minute readIs Saudi Arabia's Khoshaim & Associates' Abu Dhabi Debut a Harbinger of Change?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250