"I'm a huge proponent of having a larger US practice" – A&O's litigation chief on growth and diversity
Nine months after taking the helm of the practice, Karen Seward, one of the industry's top women, lays out her challenges and aims
February 19, 2019 at 06:10 AM
4 minute read
During a self-described mid-life crisis, Karen Seward accidentally found herself on an extreme skiing holiday as a total novice – and in the hands of a guide who was new to the job.
She managed to successfully navigate the slopes in Jackson Hole, Wyoming though, and now has a house there as well as a love of the sport.
Manoeuvring through her first year at the helm of Allen & Overy's litigation practice has also proved challenging at times.
At the same time as acting for clients, Seward has managed to visit every A&O office with a litigation offering since she took up the role last May.
It was an office tour that uncovered a few issues that needed to be addressed. One was a need for her department to address an issue that is affecting a wide range of commercial law firms: younger lawyers' growing desire for non-linear career trajectories, which may not involve becoming partner.
"People want to meander a bit and be open to opportunities, so the challenge is to manage that – we have to change our mindset," Seward says.
In order to fully engage its junior lawyers, reverse mentoring is used within the department in London and is set to be introduced across other international offices too. Seward herself has two reverse mentors at the firm, and mentors lawyers at clients too.
Seward has also introduced 'flash secondments', where lawyers can desk swap with others in different jurisdictions without having to present a formal business case to do so.
Preparing for proceedings
As well as attempting to keep hold of junior staff, the department is also preparing to bring in more lawyers as it prepares for an expected increase in work. Last year, Seward said she wanted to grow the firm's employment offering and international arbitration ranks in response to market demand. Those areas are still priorities for her, as well as investigations and financial crime.
"We're focusing on a more rounded litigation offering – if you can have a top-end employment practice married up with arbitration and litigation strength, then you can cover all areas of crisis management for companies," she says.
She adds that the firm expects to make lateral hires in financial crime and corruption this year, and that it is actively recruiting for heavyweight arbitration talent in Germany after country litigation head Daniel Busse left last autumn.
In terms of global reach, key areas for growth include Luxembourg, Asia-Pacific and the US.
While Seward firmly refuses to be drawn on the firm's ongoing merger discussions with O'Melveny & Myers, she is equally firm in her opinion that the litigation team needs to be bigger in the states, saying: "I am a huge proponent of having a larger practice in the US."
Department diversity
Another issue Seward is keen to address is improving diversity within her department, and the industry at large. She recalls forcing herself to learn everything about rugby and cricket before "interminable" lunches with male clients when she was younger – and is relieved by her impression that nowadays "women have been released from that sort of pressure".
But she remains one of few women to reach the upper echelons within the magic circle and believes change may take a while.
"We need more women around to get to a tipping point"
"It has become a big commercial driver – I think we'll see a big change but it will take a while. We need more women around to get to a tipping point," she says.
Seward adds that the real challenge is keeping women in the pipeline.
"The more flexibility you can afford people, the more chance you have of keeping them. I think partners could also do more to show they enjoy being partners, to encourage people to stick with it."
But one thing young female lawyers can do to help themselves in their careers is to identify what they admire in other women, she explains.
"Women like to look at someone who's perfect and say, 'that's it, that's the goal'. We should encourage them to borrow bits of personalities from women they admire instead."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250