Ince & Co Partners Refused To Fund Firm Bailout As Revenues Tumbled, Creditor Report Reveals
Partners were asked to help fund £8.5 million in capital to save the firm.
March 13, 2019 at 11:48 AM
3 minute read
Ince & Co partners refused to contribute to a capital call that could have prevented the firm's collapse, a report into events leading up to its demise has revealed.
Partners at the firm were informed at a meeting last October that if a sale of the business could not be completed to Gordon Dadds – then in takeover talks with the firm – then several steps would need to be taken to prevent Ince from entering administration.
All partners at the firm would have had to agree to a three-year lock-in, and the London LLP, which encompassed the firm's City, Beijing and Shanghai offices, would need to raise £8.5m of capital by April 2019.
The administrator's report to creditors, filed on Companies House this week, states that partners would need to take out additional partner loans to fund the figure.
But partners "had no appetite" to do so, according to the report – and some salaried partners at the firm who were asked to move to equity and inject capital also declined to acquiesce.
The report also details the circumstances that led the firm to require that capital injection in the first place.
Draft management accounts contained within the document show turnover at the London LLP arm of the business fell 17% from £51.6 million in the 2016-17 financial year to £42.8 million in 2017-2018.
For the six-month period to October 2018, compared to the same period the year before, revenue fell by 26% to £16.7m.
Those results had been compounded by a slew of partner departures from the firm. During the calendar 2017-18 year, 40% of Ince's equity partners left the firm, leading to "immediate issues in respect of profitability and cashflow", according to administrators Quantuma.
In December, it was resolved that former partners would not be paid outstanding capital repayments due by the end of the year in order to manage cashflow.
Former partners told Legal Week in January that they felt betrayed by their former colleagues, and that they would not have resigned if they knew that repayments of their capital would be reneged on.
Meanwhile, turnover for the International LLP – which included the rest of the firm's bases – also dropped, falling 6% from £88.9 million in 2016-17 to £83.8 million in 2017-18. For the six-month period to October 2018, revenue stood at £36.7 million.
The document also reveals that Macfarlanes and Pinsent Masons have taken roles advising on the administration, and amassed total fees of £134,164 and £123,771 respectively.
Macfarlanes has been paid £75,000 of that amount so far.
Meanwhile, administrator Quantuma expects to pocket £800,000 in fees from the process and has so far been paid £138,038.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250