EU Disregards US Call for Ban on Huawei Products but Recommends Increased Security Assessment
EU member nations are being asked to carry out individual risk assessments, which would then be pooled to help the EU decide if it needs to take further action against companies such as Huawei.
March 26, 2019 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
The European Union has chosen to disregard the U.S. Government's call for an outright ban on the use of Huawei's telecommunications equipment, choosing instead to recommend that its 28 member nations share more data on cybersecurity risks associated with the next generation of mobile telephone networks, known as 5G.
The EU will not stop mobile operators in member states from using Huawei's telecommunications equipment. Instead, the European Commission announced on Tuesday that its cybersecurity strategy will entail asking national governments to carry out individual risk assessments, which would then be pooled to help the EU decide if it needs to take further action, such as banning or restricting work with companies such as Huawei.
The strategy is partly in response to the growing number of countries, including the U.S. and Australia, that have banned working with Huawei to supply 5G infrastructure, because of fears that the Chinese Government could use the equipment to access sensitive data.
Huawei, a private company, has denied that it engages in cyber espionage and its founder has said the company would never hand over sensitive information to the Chinese Government.
Nevertheless, the U.S. has been lobbying allies in Europe to ban the use of Huawei's equipment, saying it could be used by China to carry out cyber espionage. The U.S. has also warned that it could end security cooperation with countries that allow companies such as Huawei to supply part of its telecoms infrastructure.
"There are no compelling reasons that I can see to do business with the Chinese, so long as they have the structure in place to reach in and manipulate or spy on their customers," Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the EU, said in an interview this month. "Those who are charging ahead blindly and embracing the Chinese technology without regard to these concerns may find themselves in a disadvantage in dealing with us."
But the EU stopped short of bowing to U.S. pressure.
"It's in our interest to take this security-based approach," said Julian King, the EU's security commissioner. "We need to do it for ourselves, not because anyone else has asked us to do this."
The commission's approach is for all 28 countries to carry out a national risk assessment for their 5G networks by the end of June. After that, the national assessments will be pooled to prepare an EU-level assessment by October. By the end of the year, national cybersecurity officials will decide if there is a need for measures to tackle security risks.
By the end of October 2020, member states and the commission will assess the situation and decide whether new instruments are needed to deal with any risks that have been identified.
Related Stories:
Huawei Calls for Trust and Transparency Through Common Cybersecurity Standards
Huawei Taps Jones Day, Morgan Lewis in Challenge to US Defense Law
Huawei Chief Legal Officer Says Posing a Security Threat to Other Countries Would Be 'Suicide'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250