Brexit Has London's US Law Firms Stirred Up, Not Quite Shaken
Even with uncertainty swirling, expect a pause rather than an exodus.
April 09, 2019 at 05:30 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
For Americans, non-stop headlines detailing the dysfunction of Brexit can be a welcome distraction from our own ongoing domestic turmoil. The story is anything but academic, however, for U.S. financial firms, policymakers and law firms that have made substantial investments in London in recent years.
While few of these firms are willing to talk openly about their future in the city long established as Europe's financial hub, signs point to a pause in growth – not to an exodus – among U.S. law firms. Some may even be finding ways to capitalise on ongoing Brexit confusion.
The U.K. did not leave the European Union on March 29, its original deadline for departure, with Prime Minister Theresa May unable to secure support for the withdrawal agreement she negotiated with the EU from enough members of her Conservative Party. Now, she's looking across the aisle to Labour for help. She's also seeking another extension with the EU to avoid crashing out of the bloc without any deal.
"There's no doubt what's happening in the political arena is a pantomime, and that's an insult to pantomimes," said Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams, a former managing partner at Clifford Chance.
Williams insisted that regardless of how Brexit is ultimately resolved, London's status as a global financial capital will not vanish.
"The concern is: Do some elements gradually drift away to other centres in Europe or New York?" he said. "I think London is robust or strong enough to weather some period of instability."
The length of that period and what follows it, however, are real concerns to the nearly 20 U.S. firms with more than 100 lawyers in London, the significantly larger pool with more than a dozen lawyers, as well as the vereins and partners in recent transatlantic mergers whose U.K. numbers are well into the hundreds. Research from Legal Week showed that at the end of 2017, the 50 largest U.S. firms – excluding the transatlantic vereins DLA Piper, Norton Rose Fulbright and Hogan Lovells – were home to more than 1,500 partners and almost 3,500 additional lawyers in London.
"By and large, the message from U.S. firms is: 'We don't like the uncertainty,'" Williams said.
But that doesn't mean any are pulling up stakes or moving preemptively to shift attorneys to Frankfurt, which has been floated as a winner if London loses its clout in the financial sector. Home to the European Central Bank, the German city is a mere fraction of London's size.
Some U.S. firms might even take advantage of the uncertainty to pick up talent while the competition sit on their hands. Williams noted that many American firms have been more "forensic" in their approach to lateral hiring in recent years, focused less on numbers and more on identifying top practitioners in strategic areas.
"Those who have grown rather aggressively – Kirkland, Latham, White & Case – will probably continue to hire if they find absolutely the right people," he said.
Representatives from Kirkland, Latham and roughly a dozen other U.S. firms with substantial London operations were unwilling to talk about their expectations. But Reed Smith London managing partner Andrew Jenkinson, who oversees more than 300 attorneys in the office, emphasised in a recent conversation that the underlying fundamentals in the U.K. economy are strong. That's on the heels of several very strong years for the firm, following the initial Brexit referendum in June 2016. Jenkinson said he was relieved that he pushed aside his initial fears about the impact of the vote, particularly on the firm's transactional practices, as demand in commercial real estate, M&A and finance has been unusually brisk.
"If we had done anything with our staff at that moment, we never would have been able to have benefited from the uptick in that work," he said.
Jenkinson's colleague Tamara Box, the firm's managing partner for Europe and the Middle East, added that the firm is currently being buoyed by clients seeking advice on the moving parts of Brexit.
"The need for regulatory advice in an environment where everything is up in the air and it's all to play for is pretty acute, particularly in a regulated environment," she said, highlighting the finance and energy sectors in particular. "There's far more demand than there is supply."
Box continued that the regulatory work also opens the door to transactional opportunities.
"As you are advising on what you need to do to set up shop in Europe, that's a regulatory question, but it very quickly becomes an operational, corporate and transactional question," she said, pointing to the intricacies of buying real estate and structuring a new business.
A spokesman for White & Case also highlighted that firm's success in the market during the last several years, and said the firm's 2020 strategy prioritises growth in both the U.S. and London.
"Brexit continues to cause uncertainty in the U.K. economy. That said, London is key to the work we do for our clients globally and the global nature of our practice should help form a natural hedge against issues like Brexit," the firm offered in a statement. "London is also the centre of excellence for our English law work, and the importance of English law in governing cross-border deals and disputes should be unaffected by Brexit."
Gus Black, global co-chair of Dechert's financial services group, acknowledged that a number of the firm's clients are feeling pain from the ongoing uncertainty. But he emphasised that the roughly 150 attorneys in the firm's London office have a global portfolio.
"If you look across all our practices, we don't think about London versus the rest of the world, we think about how we support our clients: international businesses, private equity firms, private credit firms, corporates, doing business in lots of different places," he said.
Black gave the example of his own private funds formation practice, representing fund managers based in London who are raising funds in Europe and all around the world, and said it was the same for his colleagues.
"Those London-based attorneys are basically engaged in helping clients pursue their business objectives on a global scale. What is happening in the U.K. market is only a piece of that," he said. "If we were a purely U.K. firm doing English law, [Brexit] would be a greater concern."
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Solicitors Regulator Sets Unusual Practice Conditions on AIG In-House Lawyer
Insurance Practice DWF Takes Team of 53 Lawyers From Australian Firm
2 minute readA&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute readResolute Mining Appoints London General Counsel—CEO Resigns Following Foreign Detention
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250