EU Lists $20BN in Proposed Tariffs on US Products Over Boeing Dispute
The products listed include aircraft, chemicals, car parts and food products, including frozen fish, citrus fruits and ketchup.
April 17, 2019 at 02:53 PM
3 minute read
The European Commission has published a list of $20 billion-worth of U.S. exports to the EU that could be hit with tariffs in retaliation for illegal subsidies for aircraft maker Boeing.
The products listed include aircraft, chemicals, car parts and food products, including frozen fish, citrus fruits and ketchup.
"European companies must be able to compete on fair and equal terms," Cecilia Malmström, the EU's trade commissioner, said in a statement. "The recent WTO ruling on U.S. subsidies for Boeing is important in this respect. We must continue to defend a level playing field for our industry.
"We do not want a tit-for-tat," she added. "While we need to be ready with countermeasures in case there is no other way out, I still believe that dialogue is what should prevail between important partners such as the EU and the U.S., including in bringing an end to this longstanding dispute."
She said the EU remains open for discussions with the U.S., provided such conditions are carried out without preconditions and "aim at a fair outcome".
Last week, the U.S. threatened tariffs on $11 billion-worth of European goods over subsidies to Europe's aircraft maker Airbus.
EU businesses have until the end of May to give their views on whether the products listed by the EU on Wednesday should be included on the definitive list of products to be hit with penalty duties.
The total value of the list of products is $20 billion but the World Trade Organization (WTO) has yet to give its opinion on the total value of the damage the subsidies have caused to European industry.
The publication of the list follows a ruling by the WTO on April 11 that the U.S. had failed to remove tax breaks and other subsidies for Boeing, despite earlier judgments that they were illegal.
At an earlier stage in the dispute between the EU and the U.S. over subsidies to their aircraft makers, the EU argued that U.S. subsidies had caused $12 billion in damages to European industry, suggesting that the total amount of U.S. products to be hit by the sanctions could be closer to the lower figure.
In April, the WTO ruled that a number of tax breaks and programmes offered at the federal and state level were illegal under global trade rules and should have been removed. These included a Washington State tax programme, South Carolina job tax credits, procurement contracts with NASA and the U.S. Department of Defense, research and development programmes, as well as the U.S. Foreign Sales Corporation and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion schemes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm
King & Spalding’s Merger Marks Key Move in Saudi Arabia’s Legal Surge
3 minute readRBG Holdings Suspends Trading After Weeks of Internal Strife and Financial Struggles
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250