Paul Hastings Beijing Partner Leaves for China's Tian Yuan Law Firm
Nan Li is the latest Chinese lawyer to move from an international firm to a domestic one. His return to a domestic firm corresponds to an ongoing shift of market share in Hong Kong IPO work from global firms to Chinese firms.
April 23, 2019 at 09:00 PM
4 minute read
|
Paul Hastings Beijing partner and chief representative Nan Li is leaving the firm to join China-based Tian Yuan Law Firm in Hong Kong.
Li will start at Tian Yuan's Hong Kong associate firm as an equity partner next week. He arrives with additional team members from Paul Hastings' Beijing office who specialise in Hong Kong capital markets transactions.
Last year, he advised Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and China Merchant Securities as the joint sponsors on Chinese biotechnology company Ascletis Pharma's $400 million Hong Kong initial public offering. The deal was the first under a changed rule that allowed pre-revenue biotech companies to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. In 2015-16, Li was part of the Paul Hastings team that advised state-owned China Ocean Shipping (Group) Co. in a multibillion-dollar restructuring and merger with China Shipping Group.
Still in his late 30s, Li is among an emerging generation of Chinese-born lawyers trained at international firms, where they rose through the ranks. He has been a partner at Paul Hastings since 2013, having first joined the firm from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
Li joins Tian Yuan as part of the Chinese firm's efforts to expand its Hong Kong law capital markets practice. With the arrival of the Paul Hastings' team, Tian Yuan will have more than 30 professionals in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong dedicated to a Hong Kong IPO practice, according to Fu Siqi, the firm's partner in charge of the Hong Kong practice.
"The addition of Nan Li and his team will help improve the quality and reputation of our Hong Kong practice among Chinese firms," said Fu. He also added that Li's return to a domestic firm corresponds to an ongoing shift of market share in Hong Kong IPO work from global firms to Chinese firms.
The Beijing-based firm first opened the Hong Kong office in late 2016 with Fu, a former Jingtian & Gongcheng partner, and ex-Clifford Chance counsel Liu Ning. In 2017, the office added Hong Kong law capability by forming an association with a local firm set up by former Shearman & Sterling lawyer William Ji. Both Liu and Ji also used to practise with Freshfields.
In March, Tian Yuan and William Ji & Co. represented Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd., as Chinese and Hong Kong counsel, respectively, on a $706 million rights issue on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
To complement its listing work, Tian Yuan also recently hired counsel Teresa Chu to handle Chinese clients' general Hong Kong corporate and commercial law needs. Chu also starts next week.
Tian Yuan is one of several Chinese law firms making a push for the Hong Kong law piece of their capital markets practice. Last week, Jingtian & Gongcheng announced its Hong Kong associate firm, L&C Legal, will officially become the firm's Hong Kong office by the end of April. This will enable Jingtian to provide Chinese and Hong Kong law advice under its own brand. Earlier this year, Shanghai-based Fangda Partners also combined with its associate firm in Hong Kong, following the hire of a Hong Kong capital markets team from Shearman & Sterling led by partner Colin Law.
In 2018, Hong Kong regained top spot as the world's leading IPO market, raising a total of $36.6 billion. A record 208 new companies were listed in Hong Kong last year, including seven responding to a major overhaul of listing rules in order to incentivise technology and biotech companies to list.
Paul Hastings did not provide information on Li's successor as Beijing office chief representative. In an emailed statement, the firm said it thanks former colleagues for their contributions to the firm, and is confident in the strength of its Greater China capital markets, private equity and M&A practices in its offices across Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong.
|Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250