EU Court Says Airbnb Should Not Be Subject to Stricter Rules in Europe
A European Court of Justice adviser said Airbnb should be treated as a digital service provider and therefore the more onerous regulations governing real estate agents do not apply
April 30, 2019 at 01:21 PM
3 minute read
Airbnb Inc. should not be subject to the same regulations as real estate agents and instead should be treated as a digital service provider, free to operate across the European Union, an adviser to the European Union's highest court said on Tuesday.
The opinion, issued by one of the European Court of Justice's advocates general, Maciej Szpunar, increases the likelihood that the full court will rule that Airbnb should not be subject to the same rules as real-estate agents. Advocate general opinions are not binding on the court but are followed in more than 70 percent of cases.
The finding followed a complaint brought in a French court against Airbnb Ireland, which runs the company's platform for all operations outside the U.S., by a French hotel chain and tourism association. The association argued that Airbnb infringed French law by failing to meet requirements that apply to real-estate agents.
The French court referred the case to the European Court of Justice for a ruling on whether Airbnb's activities fell under EU law on information society services.
The advocate general found that Airbnb should be treated as an internet service because the service is provided entirely via electronic means and does not exercise control over the provision of those services. Rather, Airbnb is an online service that connects potential guests with hosts who offer short-term accommodation, he said.
He also said the French Government had not properly notified the European Commission and the authorities in Ireland of its intention to apply French law to the company. It is unclear what the opinion would have been had the French authorities made the required notification.
Airbnb welcomed the opinion, saying in a statement that it "provides a clear overview of what rules apply to collaborative economy platforms like Airbnb and how these rules help create opportunities for consumers".
The opinion contrasts with a ruling from the European Court of Justice issued in December 2017, which found that Uber should fall under the same regulatory framework as taxi companies because it is a transport services company rather than an information services company.
Airbnb has been facing stricter rules across the EU amid criticism that it is fuelling a shortage of affordable rental properties. Paris, Amsterdam, Dublin and other European cities have imposed limits on the maximum number of nights properties can be rented on Airbnb, to deter owners from seeking longer tenancies rather than short-term rentals.
But Airbnb will likely benefit a great deal from the ruling – especially in Europe. France is Airbnb's largest market after the U.S., and Paris is its biggest single-city market. The company has been under fire around the world, with many cities claiming its services are having a negative impact on neighbourhoods and need more regulation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 2Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 3Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 4How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
- 5People in the News—Dec. 30, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Buchanan Ingersoll
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250