Partner Promotions 2019: What is Behind This Year's Bumper Rounds?
Three of the magic circle made up the most partners since the financial crisis as several firms announced their largest-ever rounds.
May 07, 2019 at 12:47 AM
4 minute read
A desire to retain talent has been cited as the driver behind an increase in partner promotions at the U.K.'s top law firms this year.
Most of the largest 20 firms have promoted more partners than they did in 2018 and several have managed all-time or 10-year highs.
Magic Circle firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Clifford Chance and Linklaters each made up the most partners since the financial crisis, while Allen & Overy made up 70 percent more partners in 2019 than it did last year.
In 2018, the Magic Circle promoted significantly fewer lawyers to partner, making up a combined total of 88 partners. This year, that figure rose to 120, despite Slaughter and May promoting just one lawyer this year.
Bird & Bird, CMS, DLA Piper, Fieldfisher and Clyde & Co all announced that their 2019 rounds were the largest ever for the firms, while Simmons & Simmons also made up its largest cohort in more than a decade.
Other firms besides Slaughters to have made up fewer partners this year include Ashurst, Pinsent Masons and Hogan Lovells, which all made up bumper rounds last year with Hogan Lovells, as well as Addleshaw Goddard. The latter two firms made up just one less partner apiece than last year.
Several market executives put the bumper rounds down to a need for firms to maintain a strong pipeline of impressive juniors.
Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams says: "I think there is, despite all of the uncertainties in the world, a 'let's get on with things' attitude in the market at the moment. Despite those uncertainties, whether they be caused by trade wars or Brexit or whatever else, the global legal market has been pretty robust. I think as a result there is a good level of confidence.
"There's an element to this of getting your talent pipeline going or you'll lose good talent, so that's an issue for some firms. Given the profile of a lot of these firms, they're also probably trying to make sure they're addressing succession issues.
"They realise they've got to motivate good people and show that although the line to partnership has gotten longer, there is still a good chance of getting to it."
Simmons & Simmons managing partner Jeremy Hoyland says the firm's bumper round could be attributed to the unusually high number of quality candidates who were put forward for partnership this year, but adds that the firm "didn't really have a strategic reason for doing this".
With regards to the wider market's motivations, however, Hoyland says: "I think it might be true to say that there was a bit of a build-up after a couple of years; I think we and some others made up fewer partners and therefore this year may be a result of pent-up demand. You also get to the point where you think: 'If we don't make these good lawyers up now, we're going to lose them.'"
DLA Piper global co-CEO Simon Levine adds: "Looking at the global economy, despite all the uncertainties, and maybe even because of those uncertainties, it has been pretty robust. If I look at how we're doing towards the financial year end, it looks like we could be having one of our strongest years.
"I think that in turn clearly reflects in our partner promotion numbers, because it tends to be the sign of confidence for a partnership when there's a good pipeline."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250