Government Mandates for Law Firms Plummet as In-House Bench Strengthens
New research suggests that despite larger in-house teams, preparing for Brexit will still require external advice.
May 14, 2019 at 03:00 AM
3 minute read
The U.K. Government cut its spending on law firms and barristers by 10% last year as the number of its in-house lawyers increased, according to new research.
Findings by Thomson Reuters suggest law firms have been feeling the impact of a government efficiency drive when it comes to legal spending, with a growing bench of in-house lawyers set tasks previously done by external advisers.
The research shows that the government spent £196.4m on external legal advice for the year to 31 March, 2018, according to an analysis of spending by 37 departments out of 47. In 2016-17, the legal spend figure was £217.2m.
Thomson Reuters' director of public sector, academic and Bar, Desmond Brady, said in a statement: "The focus on developing its in-house legal services has enabled the government to successfully manage down its spending on external law firms and barristers.
"However, external legal advisers continue to add value when required. At any one time, the government is involved in a wide range of legal engagements and this isn't going to change, which maintains the need for external advisers."
Brady added, meanwhile, that the impact of Brexit may encourage the government to continue to look to law firms for expertise on legislative matters in areas such as product standards, immigration and agriculture.
"The huge additional workload that Brexit represents will likely test the resilience of the Government Legal Department's (GLD) consolidated model – it will, no doubt, be running at full capacity.
"The legal profession expects Brexit will result in an increase in work for external law firms. We'd expect to see the same picture for government lawyers."
One City trade partner agreed that sorting through the legislative impact of Brexit could prove to be too much for the GLD to handle without additional help.
They said: "The absence of any sort of political decision means that a department that would be stretched with one scenario will likely be overwhelmed by three potential scenarios."
Meanwhile, the largest public sector legal consortium in the U.K. has surpassed its 150-member milestone in offering an affordable framework of legal services from seven law firms, which includes Weightmans and Freeths.
EM LawShare, which was set up in 2006, said today that the consortium has saved the public purse in excess of £20 million by helping public sector and local government organisations source affordable legal advice.
EM LawShare chair Jayne Francis-Ward said in a statement: "The rate of members joining is a clear indication of the importance of consortiums such as this, saving significant public expenditure.
"As budgets are squeezed at local level, we expect demand to rise further. This growth will allow our seven legal partners access to a regular pipeline of work in return for providing more financially viable legal support to our members."
The other five law firms to be covered by the consortium are: Anthony Collins Solicitors, Bevan Brittan, Browne Jacobson, Geldards, and Sharpe Pritchard.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Solicitors Regulator Sets Unusual Practice Conditions on AIG In-House Lawyer
Insurance Practice DWF Takes Team of 53 Lawyers From Australian Firm
2 minute readA&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute readResolute Mining Appoints London General Counsel—CEO Resigns Following Foreign Detention
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250