Three Firms Drop Off TfL Legal Panel
The legal panel has grown from 11 firms to 15.
May 29, 2019 at 06:55 AM
3 minute read
Transport for London (TfL) has confirmed its legal panel, with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer among a trio of firms no longer on the roster.
Simmons & Simmons and Lewis Silkin have also not been reappointed to the panel, which covers eight lots.
Work covered by the panel includes: employment and industrial relations, major commercial, rail, routine commercial and real estate, housing, property and commercial development, highways and major consents, and planning.
Addleshaw Goddard, DLA Piper and Stephenson Harwood are among the new firms to have won places on the line-up, along with Pinsent Masons, Womble Bond Dickinson and BDB Pitmans.
Ashurst, Eversheds Sutherland, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, Dentons, Herbert Smith Freehills, K&L Gates, Trowers & Hamlins and Gowling WLG all sat on the panel previously and have been reappointed.
The panel was last reviewed in 2012 for four years until 2016, but was extended for an additional two years.
It provides services to TfL, Greater London Authority, the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime, the London Legacy Development Corporation, and Old Oak Common and Park Royal Development Corporation.
TFL legal panel in full:
Lot 1: employment
- Eversheds Sutherland
Lot 2: major commercial
- Addleshaw Goddard
- Ashurst
- Burges Salmon
- Dentons
- Eversheds Sutherland
- Gowling WLG
- Herbert Smith Freehills
- K&L Gates
Lot 3: Rail
- Addleshaw Goddard
- Ashurst
- Burges Salmon
- Stephenson Harwood
Lot 4: Routine commercial and real estate
- Addleshaw Goddard
- Eversheds Sutherland
- Gowling WLG
Lot 5: Housing
- Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
- Pinsent Masons
- Trowers & Hamlins
Lot 6: Routine commercial and real estate
- Ashurst
- Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
- Burges Salmon
- Dentons
- Eversheds Sutherland
- Gowling WLG
- Herbert Smith Freehills
- Womble Bond Dickinson
Lot 7: Highways and major consents
- BDB Pitmans
- DLA Piper
- Eversheds Sutherland
- Gowling WLG
- Pinsent Masons
Lot 8: Planning
- Burges Salmon
- Gowling WLG
- Herbert Smith Freehills
- Pinsent Masons
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
New Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute read
Travers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute read
Japan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
