Allen & Overy to Hold Open Ballot if O'Melveny Merger Progresses
The magic circle firm's system would expose how partners vote on what would be an historic industry decision.
June 05, 2019 at 12:26 PM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy will hold an open ballot if its merger discussions with O'Melveny & Myers move to a vote, according to several people with knowledge of the situation.
That format would allow the firm's management to see whether individual partners had voted in favour of the tie-up or not, which some people close to the situation believe could pressure partners into voting yes.
One A&O partner, who plans to vote in favour if a vote is held, said the firm's senior partner Wim Dejonghe "feels strongly" about it being an open vote.
A second person with knowledge of the situation said: "Wim made an announcement internally saying that a partnership's decisions should be made openly and be accountable."
An A&O partner said there have been some internal disagreements about the prospect of an open ballot, but another person at the firm said the majority were in favour of the arrangement.
One person said some junior partners had previously expressed concern about an open ballot for a decision of this magnitude, arguing they would prefer the security of an anonymous vote to avoid feeling pressured into a decision.
One former A&O partner said: "No votes are secret at A&O apart from management elections. In this case, if management says the merger is a great thing to do, then it's brave to vote against it."
No timeline for any decisions has been set by either firm, with people at both firms stressing that discussions are ongoing and that a vote is still not guaranteed.
An A&O partner added: "I don't think they'll call a vote until they're sure it would go through. We have to have an ambition to do something, but it has to be on the right terms."
Two people Legal Week spoke to expect that a decision on whether to hold a vote will be made this summer, but another said there was no timeline in place.
The progression follows months of discussions between both firms' management teams, with recent issues including remuneration, pension liabilities, working capital requirements and firm governance being thrashed out.
Legal Week revealed the two firms were in merger discussions more than 12 months ago.
Since then, both firms' senior management teams have held high-level discussions across their international operations. Meetings have taken place at A&O's London office, a hotel in Germany and O'Melveny's Singapore base.
Earlier this year, O'Melveny announced record financial results. Its gross revenue increased by 8.5%, climbing just past the $800 million mark. The firm's revenue per lawyer hit $1.19 million, while a 12.6% increase in profits per equity partner brought that figure to $2.26 million.
The firm has seen several partner departures in London as discussions continue, to rival U.S. firms including Akin Gump and White & Case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250